Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;65(8):1674-1680.
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2761455. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting

Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting

Erik P Lamers et al. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Goal: The purpose of this study was: 1) to design and fabricate a biomechanically-assistive garment which was sufficiently lightweight and low-profile to be worn underneath, or as, clothing, and then 2) to perform human subject testing to assess the ability of the garment to offload the low back muscles during leaning and lifting.

Methods: We designed a prototype garment which acts in parallel with the low back extensor muscles to reduce forces borne by the lumbar musculature. We then tested eight healthy subjects while they performed common leaning and lifting tasks with and without the garment. We recorded muscle activity, body kinematics, and assistive forces.

Results: The biomechanically-assistive garment offloaded the low back muscles, reducing erector spinae muscle activity by an average of 23-43% during leaning tasks, and 14-16% during lifting tasks.

Conclusion: Experimental findings in this study support the feasibility of using biomechanically-assistive garments to reduce low back muscle loading, which may help reduce injury risks or fatigue due to high or repetitive forces.

Significance: Biomechanically-assistive garments may have broad societal appeal as a lightweight, unobtrusive, and cost-effective means to mitigate low back loading in daily life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(a) During lifting or leaning, the lumbar (low back) extension moment is the result of large muscle and ligament forces (FM) acting at short moment arms (rM) about the spine. This extension moment counterbalances flexion moments from the weight of the head-arms-trunk (FHAT) and carried weight (FW), which act at larger moment arms (rHAT and rW). (b) The large muscle and ligament forces constitute the majority of loading experienced by the intervertebral discs. Excessive and/or repetitive loading can lead to degeneration or injury of the lumbar tissues (muscles, ligaments, vertebrae, and intervertebral discs).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Biomechanically-assistive garment prototype. The prototype distributes forces over the shoulders and thighs via the upper- and lower-body interfaces. Elastic bands connect these two interfaces and act in parallel with muscles and ligaments to support the lumbar extension moment. Slack length of the elastic bands was set via adjustable clasps.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
(a) The biomechanically-assistive garment stretches during lifting and leaning. (b) Forces borne by the elastic bands are expected to offload the extensor muscles, and to reduce intervertebral disc loading by increasing the extensor moment arm (Δr). Analytically, from the moment balance equation, FE + FM < FM from Fig. 1.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Mean normalized EMG for a representative subject. (a) EMG for lifting task with vs. without the biomechanically-assistive garment prototype. Trials were parsed into cycles; a cycle began with the subject standing upright, next the subject squatted down, and then stood back upright to complete the cycle. (b) EMG for leaning task with vs. without the prototype. Mean EMG was calculated over the middle of the trial, during which the subject was leaning statically.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Mean EMG of the erector spinae muscles was reduced during leaning when wearing the biomechanically-assistive garment prototype (dark blue) vs. not wearing it (light green). Reductions were statistically significant for all leaning angles tested (p<0.05, denoted with asterisks). Intersubject means and standard deviations are depicted.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Mean and peak EMG of the erector spinae muscles were reduced during lifting when wearing the biomechanically-assistive garment (dark blue) vs. when not wearing it (light green). All reductions were statistically significant (p<0.05, denoted with asterisks). Intersubject means and standard deviations are depicted.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Theoretical reduction in lumbar disc compression force when wearing a biomechanically-assistive garment. Disc force reduction increases as a function of increasing elastic cable force (FE) and increasing moment arm (Δr).

References

    1. Andersson GB, “Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9178, pp. 581–585, Aug. 1999. - PubMed
    1. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP, and et al. , “The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain,” Arch. Intern. Med, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 251–258, Feb. 2009. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoy D et al. , “Measuring the global burden of low back pain,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 155–165, Apr. 2010. - PubMed
    1. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, and Lipton R, “Lost Productive Time and Cost Due to Common Pain Conditions in the US Workforce,” JAMA, vol. 290, no. 18, pp. 2443–2454, Nov. 2003. - PubMed
    1. Katz JN, “Lumbar Disc Disorders and Low-Back Pain: Socioeconomic Factors and Consequences,” J Bone Jt. Surg Am, vol. 88, no. suppl 2, pp. 21–24, Apr. 2006. - PubMed

Publication types