Reliability of techniques used in the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis by the national control program in Brazil: A survey in an area of recent transmission
- PMID: 28992913
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.011
Reliability of techniques used in the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis by the national control program in Brazil: A survey in an area of recent transmission
Abstract
One of the key components of the Brazilian Program for the Control of Visceral Leishmaniasis (PCLV) is the euthanasia of Leishmania-infected canine reservoirs, the detection of which depends on a screening procedure involving a Dual Path Platform® (DPP) immunoassay and a confirmatory enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The aims of the present study were to evaluate the reliability of these techniques in a region of recent transmission of canine VL, to follow up the seroconversion 3-4 months after the initial diagnosis of DPP reactive but ELISA indeterminate or non-reactive dogs, and to identify the species of Leishmania in circulation in the area. Each animal was submitted to DPP under field conditions, performed by municipal health workers using peripheral blood (DPP-field), to DPP under laboratory conditions using serum (DPP-lab) and to ELISA using serum. The agreements between the tests were determined using McNemar's χ2 test, Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) at the 95% confidence interval and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK). Of the 1130 dogs examined, 74.2% were non-reactive in all three tests applied. Based on the PCLV positive-infection criterion, seroprevalence was 8.9% (101/1130) with 83.2% (84/101) of infected animals showing reactivity in all three tests while 7.8% (8/101) were reactive in DPP-field and ELISA and 8.9% (9/101) in DPP-lab and ELISA. The proportions of disagreements were substantial in all comparisons. Inter-rater reliability between DPP-field and ELISA (k=0.55; PABAK=0.78) and DPP-lab and ELISA (k=0.59; PABAK=0.81) were considered moderate, while that between DPP-field and DPP-lab (k=0.61; PABAK=0.79) was classified as marginally good. The proportion of seroconversions in DPP reactive animals that were initially ELISA indeterminate was significantly higher than in those that were DPP reactive but initially ELISA non-reactive. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis revealed the presence of Leishmania infantum, the etiologic agent of VL, in bone marrow samples from VL-infected animals. Our data showed that the techniques and protocols currently employed in the PCLV screening approach are not entirely reliable. Further consideration should be given to monitoring dogs with undetermined results in ELISA and a better training should be provided for health workers responsible for performing DPP tests applied under field conditions.
Keywords: Agreement; Diagnosis; Leishmania infantum; Seroconversion.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of visceral leishmaniasis in A population of free-roaming dogs as determined by multiple sampling efforts: A longitudinal study analyzing the effectiveness of euthanasia.Prev Vet Med. 2018 Dec 1;161:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Prev Vet Med. 2018. PMID: 30466654
-
Environmental Factors and Ecosystems Associated with Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis in Northeastern Brazil.Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015 Dec;15(12):765-74. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1866. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015. PMID: 26684524
-
Comparative evaluation of the DPP(®) CVL rapid test for canine serodiagnosis in area of visceral leishmaniasis.Vet Parasitol. 2014 Oct 15;205(3-4):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Vet Parasitol. 2014. PMID: 25257505
-
Canine visceral leishmaniasis follow-up: a new anti-IgG serological test more sensitive than ITS-1 conventional PCR.Vet Parasitol. 2017 Dec 15;248:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 31. Vet Parasitol. 2017. PMID: 29173543
-
Serological and molecular diagnostic tests for canine visceral leishmaniasis in Brazilian endemic area: one out of five seronegative dogs are infected.Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Sep;145(12):2436-2444. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817001443. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Epidemiol Infect. 2017. PMID: 28726597 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Recommendations on vaccination for Latin American small animal practitioners: a report of the WSAVA Vaccination Guidelines Group.J Small Anim Pract. 2020 Jun;61(6):E1-E35. doi: 10.1111/jsap.13125. Epub 2020 Mar 30. J Small Anim Pract. 2020. PMID: 32227347 Free PMC article.
-
How much does it cost to prevent and control visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil? Comparing different measures in dogs.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 21;15(7):e0236127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236127. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32692783 Free PMC article.
-
Advances toward Diagnostic Tools for Managing Zoonotic Visceral Leishmaniasis.Trends Parasitol. 2018 Oct;34(10):881-890. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Aug 18. Trends Parasitol. 2018. PMID: 30131210 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of the factors associated with human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas.Infect Dis Poverty. 2025 Jan 30;14(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40249-025-01274-z. Infect Dis Poverty. 2025. PMID: 39885606 Free PMC article.
-
Canine visceral leishmaniasis: risk factors and spatial analysis in an endemic area of Northeastern Brazil.Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2023 May 22;32(2):e003223. doi: 10.1590/S1984-29612023029. eCollection 2023. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2023. PMID: 37222306 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous