Comparison of Characteristics According to Reflux Type in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
- PMID: 28993603
- PMCID: PMC5951063
- DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2017.00577
Comparison of Characteristics According to Reflux Type in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as an acidic, nonacidic, or mixed type according to 24-hour multi-channel intraluminal impedance (MII) pH monitoring and the clinical characteristics of each type.
Methods: Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent 24-hour MII pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool. Eighty-three patients were diagnosed with LPR. The patients were classified into three groups according to the pH of the hypopharyngeal probe: the acid reflux group, nonacid reflux group, and mixed reflux group. Subjective symptoms and objective findings were evaluated based on patients' responses to the Short Form 12 Survey (SF-12), LPR health-related quality of life (LPR-HRQOL), reflux symptom index, and reflux finding score.
Results: The results of each group were compared. As a result, 34 patients were classified into the nonacid reflux group and 49 into the mixed reflux group. There were no patients classified as having acid reflux alone. There was no significant difference between the two groups when comparing the reflux symptom index, reflux finding score, LPR-HRQOL, or the mental component score of the SF-12. However, the physical component score of the SF-12 was higher in the nonacid reflux group (P=0.018). The DeMeester composite score (P=0.015) and total number of LPR events (P=0.001) were lower in the nonacid reflux group than in the mixed reflux group.
Conclusion: In conclusion, no LPR patient had only acid reflux. The nonacid reflux LPR patients showed similar clinical characteristics and findings compared to the mixed reflux group, but exhibited significantly fewer LPR episodes.
Keywords: 24-Hour Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance pH Monitoring; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; Reflux Type.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association between 24-hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and symptoms or quality of life in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Jun;42(3):584-591. doi: 10.1111/coa.12817. Epub 2017 Jan 8. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28004504
-
Dual pH with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing in the Evaluation of Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1177/0194599816665819. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. PMID: 27554506
-
Patients with acid, high-fat and low-protein diet have higher laryngopharyngeal reflux episodes at the impedance-pH monitoring.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Feb;277(2):511-520. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05711-2. Epub 2019 Nov 2. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 31679054
-
Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux.JAMA. 2005 Sep 28;294(12):1534-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1534. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16189367 Review.
-
Normative Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring Metrics for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Systematic Review of 720 Healthy Individuals.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 May;166(5):802-819. doi: 10.1177/01945998211029831. Epub 2021 Jul 27. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 34313507
Cited by
-
[Clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitor combined with ranitidine in the treatment of throat reflux].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug;34(8):710-712;718. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.08.008. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32842203 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.Dig Dis Sci. 2019 May;64(5):1270-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5372-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Dig Dis Sci. 2019. PMID: 30430298 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):5873-5883. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08877-6. Epub 2024 Aug 8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 39115573 Clinical Trial.
-
Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Past, Present, and Future-A Mini-Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 7;13(9):1643. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091643. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37175034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: A systematic review.World J Clin Cases. 2019 Oct 6;7(19):2995-3011. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i19.2995. World J Clin Cases. 2019. PMID: 31624747 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, Shaw GY. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;127(1):32–5. - PubMed
-
- Hicks DM, Ours TM, Abelson TI, Vaezi MF, Richter JE. The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers. J Voice. 2002 Dec;16(4):564–79. - PubMed
-
- Ford CN. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA. 2005 Sep;294(12):1534–40. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials