Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun:1-2:50-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

MIFuzzy Clustering for Incomplete Longitudinal Data in Smart Health

Affiliations

MIFuzzy Clustering for Incomplete Longitudinal Data in Smart Health

Hua Fang. Smart Health (Amst). 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Missing data are common in longitudinal observational and randomized controlled trials in smart health studies. Multiple-imputation based fuzzy clustering is an emerging non-parametric soft computing method, used for either semi-supervised or unsupervised learning. Multiple imputation (MI) has been widely-used in missing data analyses, but has not yet been scrutinized for unsupervised learning methods, although they are important for explaining the heterogeneity of treatment effects. Built upon our previous work on MIfuzzy clustering, this paper introduces the MIFuzzy concepts and performance, theoretically, empirically and numerically demonstrate how MI-based approach can reduce the uncertainty of clustering accuracy in comparison to non- and single-imputation based clustering approach. This paper advances our understanding of the utility and strength of MIFuzzy clustering approach to processing incomplete longitudinal behavioral intervention data.

Keywords: Fuzzy clustering; MIFuzzy; Missing values; Multiple imputation; longitudinal data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual diagram of MI-Fuzzy procedure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
An illustration of mean-imputation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Clustering accuracy of single regression imputation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Clustering accuracy of single hotdeck imputation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Clustering accuracy of multiple imputation
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Performance of MI-, SI- and NI-clustering on TDTA data
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Performance of MI-, SI- and NI-clustering on QP data
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
MI- vs. SI- and NI-clustering under MCAR
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
MI- vs. SI- and NI-clustering under MAR
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
MI- vs. SI- and NI-clustering under MNAR

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sawicki P, Didjurgeit U, Mühlhauser I, Berger M. Behaviour therapy versus doctor’s anti-smoking advice in diabetic patients. Journal of internal medicine. 1993;234(4):407–409. - PubMed
    1. Marlow SP, Stoller JK. Smoking cessation. Respiratory care. 2003;48(12):1238–1256. - PubMed
    1. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Bélisle P, Joseph L, Gervais A, O’Loughlin J, Paradis G, Pihl R, Pilote L, Rinfret S, et al. Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European heart journal. 2009;30(6):718–730. - PubMed
    1. Barth J, Bengel J, Critchley J. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006;32(1):10–20. - PubMed
    1. Hennrikus DJ, Lando HA, McCarty MC, Klevan D, Holtan N, Huebsch JA, Jestus S, Pentel PR, Pine D, Sullivan S, et al. The team project: the effectiveness of smoking cessation intervention with hospital patients. Preventive medicine. 2005;40(3):249–258. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources