[Munich Nomenclature III: classification according to risk : Follow-up for conspicuous squamous findings]
- PMID: 28993907
- DOI: 10.1007/s00292-017-0382-x
[Munich Nomenclature III: classification according to risk : Follow-up for conspicuous squamous findings]
Abstract
Aim: The present study evaluates the risk of progression of cytologic diagnoses which do not require immediate therapy but do need follow-up. The presented data can contribute to risk-adapted management strategies, according to Munich Nomenclature III.
Methods: Between January 2014 and March 2016, 3396 women were diagnosed as group II-p, IIID1, III-p, IIID2, IVa-p, IVb-p, and V‑p and represent the study population. Follow-up information on all subsequent cytologic and histologic findings were collected up to July 2017. For the initial cytologic diagnosis, the cumulative risk of CIN2+ or CIN3+ and the risk for persistent pathologic findings was calculated.
Results: The cumulative risk of CIN2+ for initial findings II-p, IIID1, III-p, and IIID2 is calculated as 7.3, 17.1, 46.3, and 62.4%, respectively, after a mean observation period of 24.4, 21.1, 15.6, and 14.3 months. The cumulative risk of CIN3+ (%) is determined as 5.0, 9.3, 37.6, and 45.8. For persistent cytologic diagnoses II-p, IIID1, III-p, and IIID2, the risk of CIN2+ increases significantly after the second result (0 to 3.6, 0.21 to 3.6, 7.2 to 58.3, and 8.1 to 64.7%). Risk of CIN2+ and CIN3+ for group III-p is significantly higher for women <35 years and <30 years compared with women of higher age. There are no significant age-dependent differences for findings II-p, IIID1, and IIID2.
Conclusions: The Munich Nomenclature III classifies cytologic findings according to risk. The diagnostic groups of the Munich Nomenclature III provide a solid basis for a risk-adapted clinical management, if the cytologic history of the individual patient is taken into account.
Keywords: CIN; Cervical cancer screening; Cervical cytology; Management strategies; Munich Nomenclature III.
Similar articles
-
Three-Tiered versus Two-Tiered Classification of Squamous Dysplasia in Cervical Cytology: Results of a Follow-Up Study.Acta Cytol. 2019;63(1):44-49. doi: 10.1159/000494984. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Acta Cytol. 2019. PMID: 30517915
-
Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):43-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7464. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29971397 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of human papillomavirus distribution in cytologic subgroups of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.Cancer. 2006 Oct 25;108(5):288-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22168. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16952155 Clinical Trial.
-
Triage of women with minor abnormal cervical cytology: meta-analysis of the accuracy of an assay targeting messenger ribonucleic acid of 5 high-risk human papillomavirus types.Cancer Cytopathol. 2013 Dec;121(12):675-87. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21325. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013. PMID: 23881840 Review.
-
Posttreatment assessment of women at risk of developing high-grade cervical disease: proposal for new guidelines based on data from the Netherlands.J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Oct;18(4):338-43. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000012. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014. PMID: 24769656 Review.
Cited by
-
Registry Study of the Working Group on Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (AGCPC) on the Diagnostic Algorithm for the New Cervical Cancer Screening - Initial Data.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Oct 5;83(10):1250-1262. doi: 10.1055/a-2159-7510. eCollection 2023 Oct. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023. PMID: 37808262 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of CIN2+ in Patients with PAP III-P (ASC-H): A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;13(6):1066. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061066. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36980374 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical