Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;51(6):533-547.
doi: 10.4132/jptm.2017.08.04. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

Thyroid Cytology in India: Contemporary Review and Meta-analysis

Shipra Agarwal  1 , Deepali Jain  1
Affiliations
Review

Thyroid Cytology in India: Contemporary Review and Meta-analysis

Shipra Agarwal et al. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a screening test for triaging thyroid nodules, aiding in subsequent clinical management. However, the advantages have been overshadowed by the multiplicity of reporting systems and a wide range of nomenclature used. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) was formulated in 2007, to give the world a uniform thyroid cytology reporting system, facilitating easy interpretation by the clinicians. Here, we review the status of thyroid FNAC in India in terms of various reporting systems used including a meta-analysis of the previously published data. An extensive literature search was performed using internet search engines. The reports with detailed classification system used in thyroid cytology were included. The meta-analysis of published data was compared with the implied risk of malignancy by TBSRTC. More than 50 studies were retrieved and evaluated. TBSRTC is currently the most widely used reporting system with different studies showing good efficacy and interobserver concordance. Ancillary techniques have, as of now, limited applicability and acceptability in thyroid cytology in India. Twenty-eight published articles met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. When compared with TBSRTC recommendations, the meta-analysis showed a higher risk of malignancy for categories I and III. Thyroid FNAC is practiced all over India. TBSRTC has found widespread acceptance, with most institutions using this system for routine thyroid cytology reporting. However, reasons for a high malignancy risk for categories I and III need to be looked into. Various possible contributing factors are discussed in the review.

Keywords: Cytology; Fine-needle aspiration cytology; India; Meta-analysis; Review; The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology; Thyroid FNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Forest plot of meta-analysis on the risk of malignancy for Bethesda category I (non-diagnostic) [14,23,30-35,37,38,44,45,50,53,54,56,60,61]. ES, effect size; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Forest plot of meta-analysis on the risk of malignancy for Bethesda category II (benign)[13-17,21,23,30-38,42,44-46,49,50,52-54,56,60,61]. ES, effect size; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Forest plot of meta-analysis on the risk of malignancy for Bethesda category III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance)[23,30-32,34,38,42,44,45,53,54,56,60-62]. ES, effect size; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Forest plot of meta-analysis on the risk of malignancy for Bethesda category IV (follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neopla sm)[-,,,-,,,,,,;46,49,50,52-54,56,60,61,63]. ES, effect size ; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Forest plot of meta-analysis on the risk of malignancy for Bethesda category V (suspicious for malignancy)[13,17,21,23,30-36,38,42,44, 45,46,53,54,56,60,61]. ES, effect size; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Forest plot of meta-analysis on the risk of malignancy for Bethesda category VI (malignant)[13-17,21,23,30-36,38,42,44,45,46,49,50,52-54,56,60,61,63].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gangadharan P, Nair MK, Pradeep VM. Thyroid cancer in Kerala. In: Shah AH, Samuel AM, Rao RS, editors. Thyroid cancer: an Indian perspective. Mumbai: Quest Publications; 1999. pp. 17–32.
    1. National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research . National Cancer Registry Programme Indian Council of Medical Research. Three-year report of population based cancer registries 2012-2014. Bengaluru: NCDIR-NCRP; 2016.
    1. Unnikrishnan AG, Kalra S, Baruah M, et al. Endocrine Society of India management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules: a position statement. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;15:2–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Usha Menon V, Sundaram KR, Unnikrishnan AG, Jayakumar RV, Nair V, Kumar H. High prevalence of undetected thyroid disorders in an iodine sufficient adult south Indian population. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009;107:72–7. - PubMed
    1. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:425–37. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources