Comparison of Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With and Without Anterior Plate Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 29016435
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002441
Comparison of Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With and Without Anterior Plate Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To compare postoperative surgical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with and without plate fixation.
Summary of background data: ACDF has evolved significantly over the years, including the placement of an anterior plate construct. Although promoting bony osseo-integration at the fusion site, there are a number of plate-related complications that can arise. The non-plating approach is less invasive, however, greater rates of cage subsidence have been associated with this model.
Methods: We performed an electronic literature search for human studies that directly compared ACDF with and without anterior plate fixation. Outcomes of interest comprised of postoperative dysphagia, fusion success, and cage subsidence as well as patient reported outcomes, including the Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for both neck and arm pain.
Results: A total of 15 studies (12 observational and 3 randomized controlled trials) and 893 patients (57% males) were included. Overall, ACDF with plate fixation was associated with significantly higher vertebral fusion rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-3.37), lower subsidence rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.52), and more favorable VAS-neck pain scores at last follow-up (mean difference [MD] 0.59, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.41). Conversely, ACDF procedures without plate fixation had marginally better long-term VAS-arm pain scores (mean difference [MD] 0.2, 95% CI 0.04-0.36). No difference was found with regards to dysphagia (OR 1.21, 95% CI, 0.57-2.56) and NDI (MD 0.06, 95% C.I -0.54 to 0.42).
Conclusion: Available evidence, although limited, suggests superior surgical outcomes in ACDF procedures with anterior plate fixation (increased fusion, decreased subsidence) and slightly better VAS-neck pain scores at last follow-up. Future longitudinal, multicenter randomized controlled trials should be completed to validate any associations found in this study.
Level of evidence: 3.
Comment in
-
TO THE EDITOR.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E693. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003042. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31095074 No abstract available.
-
TO THE EDITOR.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E693-E696. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003039. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31095075 No abstract available.
References
-
- Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A:607–624.
-
- Marawar S, Girardi FP, Sama AA, et al. National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:1454–1459.
-
- Veeravagu A, Cole T, Jiang B, et al. Revision rates and complication incidence in single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures: an administrative database study. Spine J 2014; 14:1125–1131.
-
- Song KJ, Taghavi CE, Lee KB, et al. The efficacy of plate construct augmentation versus cage alone in anterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:2886–2892.
-
- Hacker RJ. Threaded cages for degenerative cervical disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002. 39–46. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
