Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jan 1;53(1):12-19.
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx066.

No Impact of Calorie or Unit Information on Ad Libitum Alcohol Consumption

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

No Impact of Calorie or Unit Information on Ad Libitum Alcohol Consumption

Olivia M Maynard et al. Alcohol Alcohol. .

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the impact of unit and calorie information on drinking behaviour in an ad libitum taste test paradigm.

Methods: In this experimental human laboratory study, participants were randomized to one of four conditions, balanced by gender, using a 2 (unit information: present vs. absent) × 2 (calorie information: present vs. absent) between-subjects design. The percentage of beer consumed during the taste test was the primary outcome measure.

Results: Among this largely undergraduate student population, we found no evidence that either unit or calorie information impacted alcohol consumption in an ad libitum taste test. A manipulation check indicated that few of the participants receiving either unit and/or calorie information could accurately recall the number of units and/or calories in the beverages provided to them, indicating low levels of engagement with this information. Analysis of qualitative reactions to calorie and unit labelling indicated possible negative unintended consequences of calorie and unit information, including using unit information to facilitate consumption of higher strength beverages, and calorie information to reduce food consumption prior to a drinking episode.

Conclusion: We find no evidence to support an effect of unit or calorie information, a public-health initiative supported by the alcohol industry, on drinking behaviour. It is possible that compulsory unit and calorie labelling, at least in the numeric format used here, would have no effect on alcohol intake and may even have some negative unintended consequences among certain populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Scatter plot displaying percentage of beer consumed for participants in the (A) no unit information/unit information conditions and (B) no calorie information/calorie information conditions.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Responses to the question (A) ‘How would calorie information influence your alcohol consumption?’ and (B) ‘How would unit information influence your alcohol consumption?’.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annunziata A, Pomarici E, Vecchio R, et al. (2016) Nutritional information and health warnings on wine labels: exploring consumer interest and preferences. Appetite 106:58–69. - PubMed
    1. Bohn MJ, Krahn DD, Staehler BA (1995) Development and initial validation of a measure of drinking urges in abstinent alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 19:600–6. - PubMed
    1. Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Am Econ J Econ Policy 3:91–128.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101.
    1. Bui MY, Burton S, Howlett E, et al. (2008) What am i drinking? The effects of serving facts information on alcohol beverage containers. J Consum Aff 42:81–99.

Publication types