Cost-effectiveness of IDH testing in diffuse gliomas according to the 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system recommendations
- PMID: 29016871
- PMCID: PMC5716163
- DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox120
Cost-effectiveness of IDH testing in diffuse gliomas according to the 2016 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system recommendations
Abstract
Background: Due to the decreasing prevalence of IDH1 mutations in older patients, the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of brain tumors proposed not to perform sequencing for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) in glioblastoma patients ≥55 years old. We present a cost-effectiveness analysis to estimate the financial impact of these guidelines.
Methods: From 2010 to 2015 we performed 1023 IDH tests in gliomas, amounting to ~$1.09 million in direct laboratory test costs. Samples were tested using R132H-specific immunohistochemistry, DNA sequencing validated for detection of noncanonical IDH1/2 mutations, or both methods.
Results: In cases tested by DNA sequencing, the fraction of non-R132H mutations was 5.4%, which included only 2 high-grade gliomas in patients ≥55 years (0.9%). When remodeling the optimal age cutoff in our patient population using 5-year age-binning, we found a 10-times higher pretest probability for the presence of a noncanonical IDH1 mutation in the setting of a negative IDH1-R132H immunohistochemistry result in patients <55 years. Applying the independently confirmed age cutoff of 55 years to glioblastoma patients (64%) would result in $403200 saved (43%). By not performing sequencing in patients ≥55 years, the turn-around time to final integrated neuropathological diagnosis is reduced by 53%, allowing these patients to gain earlier benefits from personalized genomic medicine.
Conclusion: The negligible prevalence of noncanonical IDH mutations in glioblastoma patients ≥55 years argues against universal IDH sequencing in this population. We predict that adoption of this age-based sequencing cutoff recommendation from the 2016 WHO guidelines will result in significant cost and time savings throughout the global health care system.
Keywords: IDH testing; biomarker; cost-effectiveness; reimbursement; turn-around time.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
Figures



Comment in
-
IDH mutation testing in gliomas-where do we draw the line?Neuro Oncol. 2017 Nov 29;19(12):1568-1569. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox164. Neuro Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29140514 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Balss J, Meyer J, Mueller W, Korshunov A, Hartmann C, von Deimling A. Analysis of the IDH1 codon 132 mutation in brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;116(6):597–602. - PubMed
-
- Hartmann C, Hentschel B, Tatagiba M et al. ; German Glioma Network. Molecular markers in low-grade gliomas: predictive or prognostic? Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(13):4588–4599. - PubMed
-
- Hartmann C, Meyer J, Balss J et al. . Type and frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are related to astrocytic and oligodendroglial differentiation and age: a study of 1,010 diffuse gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;118(4):469–474. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous