Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec 2;67(8):601-608.
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx111.

Work-related stress assessed by a text message single-item stress question

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Work-related stress assessed by a text message single-item stress question

B Arapovic-Johansson et al. Occup Med (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: Given the prevalence of work stress-related ill-health in the Western world, it is important to find cost-effective, easy-to-use and valid measures which can be used both in research and in practice.

Aims: To examine the validity and reliability of the single-item stress question (SISQ), distributed weekly by short message service (SMS) and used for measurement of work-related stress.

Methods: The convergent validity was assessed through associations between the SISQ and subscales of the Job Demand-Control-Support model, the Effort-Reward Imbalance model and scales measuring depression, exhaustion and sleep. The predictive validity was assessed using SISQ data collected through SMS. The reliability was analysed by the test-retest procedure.

Results: Correlations between the SISQ and all the subscales except for job strain and esteem reward were significant, ranging from -0.186 to 0.627. The SISQ could also predict sick leave, depression and exhaustion at 12-month follow-up. The analysis on reliability revealed a satisfactory stability with a weighted kappa between 0.804 and 0.868.

Conclusions: The SISQ, administered through SMS, can be used for the screening of stress levels in a working population.

Keywords: Predictive validity; screening; single-item question; text message; work-related stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The flow of participants in the convergent validation study*. *One of the employees moved from one unit to another. Therefore, the total number of employees employed at some point in time is 121 + 10 + 22 − 1= 152. The response rate is 118/152 = 78%.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow chart predictive validity.

References

    1. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M. Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders: a systematic review. Occup Med (Lond) 2010;60:277–286. - PubMed
    1. Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32:443–462. - PubMed
    1. European Commission. Guidance on Work-Related Stress. Spice of Life or Kiss of Death? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000.
    1. Karasek R, Theorell T.. Healthy Work. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1990.
    1. Work-Related Disorders. Swedish Work Environment Authority, 2016.

Publication types