Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1204-1210.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx066.

Automatable algorithms to identify nonmedical opioid use using electronic data: a systematic review

Chelsea Canan  1 , Jennifer M Polinski  2 , G Caleb Alexander  1   3   4 , Mary K Kowal  2 , Troyen A Brennan  2 , William H Shrank  5
Affiliations

Automatable algorithms to identify nonmedical opioid use using electronic data: a systematic review

Chelsea Canan et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: Improved methods to identify nonmedical opioid use can help direct health care resources to individuals who need them. Automated algorithms that use large databases of electronic health care claims or records for surveillance are a potential means to achieve this goal. In this systematic review, we reviewed the utility, attempts at validation, and application of such algorithms to detect nonmedical opioid use.

Materials and methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for articles describing automatable algorithms that used electronic health care claims or records to identify patients or prescribers with likely nonmedical opioid use. We assessed algorithm development, validation, and performance characteristics and the settings where they were applied. Study variability precluded a meta-analysis.

Results: Of 15 included algorithms, 10 targeted patients, 2 targeted providers, 2 targeted both, and 1 identified medications with high abuse potential. Most patient-focused algorithms (67%) used prescription drug claims and/or medical claims, with diagnosis codes of substance abuse and/or dependence as the reference standard. Eleven algorithms were developed via regression modeling. Four used natural language processing, data mining, audit analysis, or factor analysis.

Discussion: Automated algorithms can facilitate population-level surveillance. However, there is no true gold standard for determining nonmedical opioid use. Users must recognize the implications of identifying false positives and, conversely, false negatives. Few algorithms have been applied in real-world settings.

Conclusion: Automated algorithms may facilitate identification of patients and/or providers most likely to need more intensive screening and/or intervention for nonmedical opioid use. Additional implementation research in real-world settings would clarify their utility.

Keywords: automated algorithms; electronic claims data; electronic health record; nonmedical opioid use; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram: studies identified, excluded, and included using search strategy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE. et al. Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths — United States, 2000–2014. Morbid Mortal Week Rep. 2016;64;1378–82. - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Announces Safety Labeling Changes and Postmarket Study Requirements for Extended-release and Long-acting Opioid Analgesics. 2013. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm367726.htm. Accessed February 1, 2017.
    1. Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Center for Technical Assistance and Training. Prescription Drug Monitoring Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). 2015. http://www.pdmpassist.org/content/prescription-drug-monitoring-frequentl.... Accessed April 30, 2016.
    1. Butler SF, Budman SH, Fernandez K. et al. Validation of a screener and opioid assessment measure for patients with chronic pain. Pain. 2004;112:65–75. - PubMed
    1. Butler SF, Fernandez K, Benoit C. et al. Validation of the revised Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP-R). J Pain. 2008;9:360–72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types