Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):301-305.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cix719.

The Manufacturers' Perspective on World Health Organization Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics

Affiliations

The Manufacturers' Perspective on World Health Organization Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics

Sébastien Morin et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

In vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs) help clinicians determine specific conditions, monitor therapeutic efficacy, and prevent drug resistance development. While stringent regulatory authorities (SRAs) regulate IVDs in most high-income countries, regulatory authorities in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are nonexistent or do not enforce rigorous standards. In 2010, the World Health Organization established its Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics (PQDx) program to ensure "access to safe, appropriate and affordable" IVDs, especially in LMICs with little or no domestic regulatory frameworks, thereby reaching underserved populations. However, challenges in PQDx policies and procedures include an overloaded pipeline, timelines not publicly available, confusion about which products PQDx focuses on, perceived burden for documenting changes to prequalified products, overlap with SRA approvals, and uncertainty around long-term financing. PQDx can maximize its impact by considering the perspective of IVD manufacturers; similarly, IVD manufacturers should exercise adequate quality control over their submissions and associated processes.

Keywords: World Health Organization; in vitro diagnostics; low- and middle-income countries; prequalification; regulatory environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed October 2016.
    1. McNerney R. Diagnostics for developing countries. Diagnostics (Basel) 2015; 5:200–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruno P. The importance of diagnostic test parameters in the interpretation of clinical test findings: the Prone Hip Extension Test as an example. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2011; 55:69–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mori M, Ravinetto R, Jacobs J. Quality of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics in resource-limited settings. Trop Med Int Health 2011; 16:1439–49. - PubMed
    1. Rugera SP, McNerney R, Poon AK et al. . Regulation of medical diagnostics and medical devices in the East African community partner states. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:524. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types