Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Oct 11;17(1):802.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4807-5.

Social disparities in the prevalence of diabetes in Australia and in the development of end stage renal disease due to diabetes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in Australia and Maori and Pacific Islanders in New Zealand

Affiliations
Observational Study

Social disparities in the prevalence of diabetes in Australia and in the development of end stage renal disease due to diabetes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in Australia and Maori and Pacific Islanders in New Zealand

Kathleen Hill et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Disparities in health status occur between people with differing socioeconomic status and disadvantaged groups usually have the highest risk exposure and the worst health outcome. We sought to examine the social disparities in the population prevalence of diabetes and in the development of treated end stage renal disease due to type 1 diabetes which has not previously been studied in Australia and New Zealand in isolation from type 2 diabetes.

Methods: This observational study examined the population prevalence of diabetes in a sample of the Australian population (7,434,492) using data from the National Diabetes Services Scheme and of treated end stage renal disease due to diabetes using data from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. The data were then correlated with the Australian Bureau of Statistics Socioeconomic Indexes for Areas for an examination of socioeconomic disparities.

Results: There is a social gradient in the prevalence of diabetes in Australia with disease incidence decreasing incrementally with increasing affluence (Spearman's rho = .765 p < 0.001). There is a higher risk of developing end stage renal disease due to type 1 diabetes for males with low socioeconomic status (RR 1.20; CI 1.002-1.459) in comparison to females with low socioeconomic status. In Australia and New Zealand Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, Maori and Pacific Islanders appear to have a low risk of end stage renal disease due to type 1 diabetes but continue to carry a vastly disproportionate burden of end stage renal disease due to type 2 diabetes (RR 6.57 CI 6.04-7.14 & 6.48 CI 6.02-6.97 respectively p < 0.001) in comparison to other Australian and New Zealanders.

Conclusion: Whilst low socioeconomic status is associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes the inverse social gradient seen in this study has not previously been reported. The social disparity seen in relation to treated end stage renal disease due to type 2 diabetes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, Maori and Pacific Islanders has changed very little in the past 20 years. Addressing the increasing incidence of diabetes in Australia requires consideration of the underlying social determinants of health.

Keywords: Aboriginal and Torres Strait islanders; Australia; Diabetes; New Zealand; Renal disease; Socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (SACHREC), reference number 564.13.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Population prevalence (percentage) of any form of diabetes by collation of the sample post codes ranked into SEIFA deciles from 1 (lowest area SES) to 10 (highest area SES) 2014
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Population prevalence (percentage) of T1DM in Australia by collation of the sample post codes ranked into SEIFA deciles from 1 (lowest area SES) to 10 (highest area SES) 2014

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Diabetes Australia. 2014. https://www.diabetesaustralia.com.au/.
    1. Diabetes UK. 2017. https://www.diabetes.org.uk/.
    1. International Diabetes Federation, 2015.
    1. Talmud PJ, et al. Sixty-Five Common Genetic Variants and Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2015;64(5):1830–1840. doi: 10.2337/db14-1504. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knip M. Pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes: implications for incidence trends. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;76(Suppl 1):57–64. doi: 10.1159/000329169. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms