Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 11;6(10):e006260.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006260.

Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Context With Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Justin M Bachmann  1   2 , Shi Huang  2   3 , Deepak K Gupta  4   2 , Loren Lipworth  2   5 , Michael T Mumma  6 , William J Blot  5 , Elvis A Akwo  2   5 , Sunil Kripalani  7 , Mary A Whooley  8   9 , Thomas J Wang  4   2 , Matthew S Freiberg  4   2
Affiliations

Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Context With Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Justin M Bachmann et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is underutilized in the United States, with fewer than 20% of eligible patients participating in CR programs. Individual socioeconomic status is associated with CR utilization, but data regarding neighborhood characteristics and CR are sparse. We investigated the association of neighborhood socioeconomic context with CR participation in the SCCS (Southern Community Cohort Study).

Methods and results: The SCCS is a prospective cohort study of 84 569 adults in the southeastern United States from 2002 to 2009, 52 117 of whom have Medicare or Medicaid claims. Using these data, we identified participants with hospitalizations for myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass surgery and ascertained their CR utilization. Neighborhood socioeconomic context was assessed using a neighborhood deprivation index derived from 11 census-tract level variables. We analyzed the association of CR utilization with neighborhood deprivation after adjusting for individual socioeconomic status. A total of 4096 SCCS participants (55% female, 57% black) with claims data were eligible for CR. CR utilization was low, with 340 subjects (8%) participating in CR programs. Study participants residing in the most deprived communities (highest quintile of neighborhood deprivation) were less than half as likely to initiate CR (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.66, P<0.001) as those in the lowest quintile. CR participation was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.996, P<0.05).

Conclusions: Lower neighborhood socioeconomic context was associated with decreased CR participation independent of individual socioeconomic status. These data invite research on interventions to increase CR access in deprived communities.

Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation; cardiovascular mortality; neighborhood deprivation; socioeconomic position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of neighborhood deprivation indices among Southern Community Cohort Study participants eligible for cardiac rehabilitation (N=4096).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of odds ratios of cardiac rehabilitation participation for each quintile of the neighborhood deprivation index, with 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence intervals (N=4096). The first quintile (referent) represents the lowest deprivation, and the fifth quintile represents the highest deprivation. Odds ratios are adjusted for eligibility diagnosis, age, sex, race, distance to the nearest cardiac rehabilitation center, education level, household income, health insurance type, and comorbidities.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for all‐cause mortality over 10 years of follow‐up, stratified by cardiac rehabilitation participants and nonparticipants (N=4096, P=0.01 by log‐rank test). CR indicates cardiac rehabilitation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier survival curve for cardiovascular mortality over 10 years of follow‐up, stratified by cardiac rehabilitation participants and nonparticipants (N=4096, P=0.051 by log‐rank test). CR indicates cardiac rehabilitation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Arena R, Williams M, Forman DE, Cahalin LP, Coke L, Myers J, Hamm L, Kris‐Etherton P, Humphrey R, Bittner V, Lavie CJ; American Heart Association Exercise CR, Prevention Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology CoE, Prevention, Council on Nutrition PA, Metabolism . Increasing referral and participation rates to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the valuable role of healthcare professionals in the inpatient and home health settings: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125:1321–1329. - PubMed
    1. Balady GJ, Ades PA, Bittner VA, Franklin BA, Gordon NF, Thomas RJ, Tomaselli GF, Yancy CW; American Heart Association Science A, Coordinating C . Referral, enrollment, and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs at clinical centers and beyond: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124:2951–2960. - PubMed
    1. Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Schulman KA, Whellan DJ. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long‐term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Circulation. 2010;121:63–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, Skidmore B, Stone JA, Thompson DR, Oldridge N. Exercise‐based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116:682–692. - PubMed
    1. Kwan G, Balady GJ. Cardiac rehabilitation 2012: advancing the field through emerging science. Circulation. 2012;125:e369–e373. - PubMed

MeSH terms