Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;27(1):33-58.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0145-0. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling

Affiliations

Development of FOCUS-GC: Framework for Outcomes of Clinical Communication Services in Genetic Counseling

Deborah Cragun et al. J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Conceptual frameworks bring together existing theories and models in order to identify, consolidate, and fill in gaps between theory, practice, and evidence. Given the vast number of possible outcomes that could be studied in genetic counseling, a framework for organizing outcomes and postulating relationships between communication services and genetic counseling outcomes was sought. Through an iterative approach involving literature review, thematic analysis, and consolidation, outcomes and processes were categorized to create and define components of a conceptual framework. The final product, "Framework for Outcomes of Clinical commUnication Services" (FOCUS) contains the following domains: communication strategy; communication process measures; patient care experience, patient changes, patient health; and family changes. A website was created to allow easier access and ongoing modifications to the framework. In addition, a step-by-step guide and two examples were created to show flexibility in how the framework can be used. FOCUS may help in conceptualizing, organizing and summarizing outcomes research related to risk communication and counseling in genetic service delivery as well as other healthcare settings.

Keywords: Cascade testing; Evaluation; Family communication; Genetic counseling; Genetic services; Patient communication; Patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Heather Zierhut, PhD, MS and Deborah Cragun, PhD, MS declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Framework for Outcomes in Clinical Communication Services (FOCUS)
Figure 2
Figure 2
FOCUS on Genetic Counseling to Improve Family Communication and Appropriate Service Utilization
Figure 3
Figure 3
FOCUS on Genetic Counseling to Promote Quality Health Decisions

References

    1. Accreditation Counsel for Genetic Counseling. Practice-Based Competencies for Genetic Counselors Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling 2015
    1. Bernhardt BA, Biesecker BB, Mastromarino CL. Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2000;94(3):189–97. - PubMed
    1. Chivers Seymour K, Addington-Hall J, Lucassen AM, Foster CL. What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2010;19(4):330–42. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press. 2001 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057539. - PubMed
    1. DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler M. In: Emerging theories in health promotion pracitce and research. 2. DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler M, editors. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.

Publication types

MeSH terms