Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;100(2):111-115.
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0161. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Local recurrence after 'standard' abdominoperineal resection: do we really need ELAPE?

A Xanthis  1 , D Greenberg  2 , B Jha  2 , O Olafimihan  1 , R Miller  1 , N Fearnhead  1 , J Davies  1 , N Hall  1
Affiliations

Local recurrence after 'standard' abdominoperineal resection: do we really need ELAPE?

A Xanthis et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction Low rectal cancers requiring abdominoperineal resection tend to have a worse prognosis than higher tumours, which may be treated by anterior resection. One of the reasons for this may be inadequate local surgery, in particular the narrow waist of the resection specimen of a standard abdominoperineal resection may be associated with a high positive circumferential resection margin. The extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) aims to improve the R0 resection rate but carries significant morbidity. We examined our own results of standard abdominoperineal resection to assess the need for a change of policy. Methods We operformed a retrospective analysis of consecutive standard abdominoperineal resections for rectal cancer in a single centre from June 2002 to December 2011. Results A total of 102 patients underwent standard abdominoperineal resection with curative intent; 19 had no preoperative treatment, 42 had short course radiotherapy, 9 had long course radiotherapy and 32 had neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by long course chemoradiotherapy. In 17/102(16.6%), there was a positive circumferential resection margin. Over a median follow up of 32 months, 20 patients developed recurrence of any type. Local recurrence occurred in five patients (two of which also had distant recurrence), of whom two had a positive circumferential resection margin (P = 0.10). Actuarial two-year local only recurrence was 3.4% and any recurrence was 17.7%. Overall five-year cancer specific survival was 77%. Conclusions In this series we found low rates of local recurrence after standard abdominoperineal resection even with a circumferential margin rate positivity of 16.6%.Performing an ELAPE in selected cases may improve these results further but is not necessarily required for all patients.

Keywords: Abdominoperineal excision; Circumferential resection margin; Local recurrence; Rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall recurrence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Any local recurrence in circumferential resection margin negative and positive patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Any recurrence in circumferential resection margin negative and positive patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Corman ML. Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon: by W. Ernest Miles, 1869–1947. Dis Colon Rectum 1980; (3): 202–205. - PubMed
    1. Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908). CA Cancer J Clin 1971; (6): 361–364. - PubMed
    1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982; (10): 613–616. - PubMed
    1. Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, North WR, Heald RJ. ‘Close shave’ in anterior resection. Br J Surg 1990; (5): 510–512. - PubMed
    1. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ et al. . Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; (4): 588–599. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources