Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;27(1):93-98.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6031. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

Trends in Early Prenatal Care Among Women with Pre-Existing Diabetes: Have Income Disparities Changed?

Affiliations

Trends in Early Prenatal Care Among Women with Pre-Existing Diabetes: Have Income Disparities Changed?

Khadijah Breathett et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Women with pre-existing diabetes are at high maternal risk for comorbidities and death, particularly when early prenatal care is not received. Low income is a known barrier to early prenatal care. It is unknown whether recent policies to expand access to prenatal care have reduced income disparities. We hypothesized that income disparities would be minimized and that the odds of receipt of first trimester prenatal care among women with pre-existing diabetes would become similar across income strata over time.

Material and methods: Using the Colorado birth certificate registry from 2007 to 2014, receipt of prenatal care was assessed retrospectively in 2,497 women with pre-existing diabetes. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between high (>$50,000), medium ($25,000-50,000), and low (<$25,000) income strata and receipt of first trimester prenatal care by birth year, adjusted for demographics.

Results: High, medium, and low income represented 29.5%, 19.0%, and 51.5% of the cohort, respectively. Women with high income were more likely to receive first trimester care than women with low income from 2007 [adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 2.16 (1.18, 3.96)] through 2013 [1.66 (1.01, 2.73)], but significant differences were no longer observed in 2014 [1.59 (0.89, 2.84)]. The likelihood of receiving first trimester prenatal care was not significantly different between medium- and low-income strata from 2007 [1.07 (0.66, 1.74)] through 2014 [0.77 (0.48, 1.23)].

Conclusions: From 2007 to 2013, women in Colorado with diabetes were more likely to receive early prenatal care if they were in the highest income stratum than in the lowest stratum. In 2014, receipt of first trimester care became equitable across all income strata. Future work should examine national patterns of income with receipt of prenatal care and outcomes among women with pre-existing diabetes.

Keywords: policy; pregnancy; socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Flowchart of mothers with pre-existing diabetes included in the Retrospective Cohort Study from Colorado birth certificate data during 2007–2014.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Trends in receipt of first trimester prenatal care among women with high versus low annual household income. The solid black line represents the OR of receipt of first trimester prenatal care for women with high versus low annual household income. The gray shade represents the 95% CI band. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
<b>FIG. 3.</b>
FIG. 3.
Trends in receipt of first trimester prenatal care among women with medium versus low annual household income. The solid black line represents the OR of receipt of first trimester prenatal care for women with medium versus low annual household income. The gray shade represents the 95% CI band.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kitzmiller JL, Block JM, Brown FM, Catalano PM, Conway DL, Coustan DR, et al. . Managing preexisting diabetes for pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1060–1079 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carter EB, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Prenatal visit utilization and outcomes in pregnant women with type II and gestational diabetes. J Perinatol 2017;37:122–126 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prenatal Care Utilization, Child Health USA 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/chusa13/health-services-utilization/p/prenatal-care... Accessed May18, 2016
    1. Allen AJ, Snowden JM, Lau B, Cheng Y, Caughey AB. Type-2 diabetes mellitus: Does prenatal care affect outcomes? suggested running head: Treatment of T2DM and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;15:1–15 - PubMed
    1. Feig DS, Razzaq A, Sykora K, Hux JE, Anderson GM. Trends in deliveries, prenatal care, and obstetrical complications in women with pregestational diabetes: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996–2001. Diabetes Care 2006;29:232–235 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources