Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 10;37(3):390-404.
doi: 10.1002/sim.7513. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Covariate adjustment using propensity scores for dependent censoring problems in the accelerated failure time model

Affiliations

Covariate adjustment using propensity scores for dependent censoring problems in the accelerated failure time model

Youngjoo Cho et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

In many medical studies, estimation of the association between treatment and outcome of interest is often of primary scientific interest. Standard methods for its evaluation in survival analysis typically require the assumption of independent censoring. This assumption might be invalid in many medical studies, where the presence of dependent censoring leads to difficulties in analyzing covariate effects on disease outcomes. This data structure is called "semicompeting risks data," for which many authors have proposed an artificial censoring technique. However, confounders with large variability may lead to excessive artificial censoring, which subsequently results in numerically unstable estimation. In this paper, we propose a strategy for weighted estimation of the associations in the accelerated failure time model. Weights are based on propensity score modeling of the treatment conditional on confounder variables. This novel application of propensity scores avoids excess artificial censoring caused by the confounders and simplifies computation. Monte Carlo simulation studies and application to AIDS and cancer research are used to illustrate the methodology.

Keywords: informative censoring; observational study; perturbation; resampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fine JP, Jiang H, Chappell R. On semicompeting risks data. Biometrika. 2001;88(4):907–919. doi: 10.1093/biomet/88.4.907. - DOI
    1. Varadhan R, Xue Q-L, Bandeen-Roche K. Semicompeting risks in aging research: methods, issues and needs. Lifetime Data Analysis. 2014;20(4):538–562. doi: 10.1007/s10985-014-9295-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin DY, Robins JM, Wei LJ. Comparing two failure time distributions in the presence of dependent censoring. Biometrika. 1996;83(2):381–393. doi: 10.1093/biomet/83.2.381. - DOI
    1. Peng L, Fine JP. Rank estimation of accelerated lifetime models with dependent censoring. Journal of the American statistical Association. 2006;101(475):1085–1093. doi: 10.1198/016214506000000131. - DOI
    1. Ding AA, Shi G, Wang W, Hsieh J-J. Marginal regression analysis for semicompeting risks data under dependent censoring. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 2009;36(3):481–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2008.00635.x. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources