Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Feb;78(2):278-288.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.065. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Clinical and dermoscopic characterization of pediatric and adolescent melanomas: Multicenter study of 52 cases

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Clinical and dermoscopic characterization of pediatric and adolescent melanomas: Multicenter study of 52 cases

Cristina Carrera et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Knowledge regarding the morphologic spectrum of pediatric melanoma (PM) is sparse, and this may in part contribute to delay in detection and thicker tumors.

Objective: To analyze the clinicodermoscopic characteristics of PM.

Methods: Retrospective study of 52 melanomas diagnosed in patients before the age of 20 years.

Results: On the basis of its clinical, dermoscopic, and histopathologic characteristics, PM can be classified as spitzoid or nonspitzoid. The nonspitzoid melanomas (n = 37 [72.3%]) presented in patients with a mean age of 16.3 years (range, 8-20) and were associated with a high-risk phenotype and a pre-existing nevus (62.2%). The spitzoid melanomas (n = 15 [27.7%]) were diagnosed in patients at a mean age of 12.5 years (range, 2-19) and were mostly de novo lesions (73.3%) located on the limbs (73.3%). Whereas less than 25% of PMs fulfilled the modified clinical ABCD criteria (amelanotic, bleeding bump, color uniformity, de novo at any diameter), 40% of spitzoid melanomas did. Dermoscopic melanoma criteria were found in all cases. Nonspitzoid melanomas tended to be multicomponent (58.3%) or have nevus-like (25%) dermoscopic patterns. Spitzoid melanomas revealed atypical vascular patterns with shiny white lines (46.2%) or an atypical pigmented spitzoid pattern (30.8%). There was good correlation between spitzoid subtype histopathologically and dermoscopically (κ = 0.66).

Limitations: A retrospective study without re-review of pathologic findings.

Conclusion: Dermoscopy in addition to conventional and modified clinical ABCD criteria helps in detecting PM. Dermoscopy assists in differentiating spitzoid from nonspitzoid melanomas.

Keywords: Spitz; childhood; dermoscopy; detection; melanoma; pediatric melanoma; spitzoid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Pattern 1, Multicomponent pattern. Non-Spitzoid melanomas in adolescents.
a) Clinically, symmetric 6mm pigmented lesion on the upper limb of 18yo girl. b) Dermoscopy: Asymmetric polychromic (white, blue-grey, light and dark brown) multicomponent pattern, with irregular globules, negative network and structureless white regression central area. Melanoma arising in a nevus, Breslow 0.4mm. c) Clinically, asymmetric 12mm lesion on the back of a 13year old girl affected by multiple atypical nevi and familial melanoma. d) Dermoscopy: Asymmetric multicomponent polychromic pattern, irregular globules and negative network and focal bluegrey regression. Melanoma arising in a nevus, Breslow 0.3mm. e) Clinically symmetric pigmented lesion on the trunk of 14 year old girl presenting multiple nevi. f) Dermoscopy: asymmetric multicomponent pattern, with network, irregular globules, islands of negative network and structureless areas. Superficial spreading Melanoma, Breslow 0.7mm.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Pattern 2, Nevus-like. Non-Spitzoid melanomas in adolescents.
a) Clinically, symmetric 5mm lesion on a 19 year old boy. b) Dermoscopy: Symmetric globular pattern, with structureless central black area. Superficial spreading Melanoma, Breslow 0.6mm. c) Clinically, symmetric light brown macule on the chest of a 17year old boy affected by multiple atypical nevi and previous melanoma. d) Dermoscopy: Symmetric light brown lesion showing irregular globules and negative network. Melanoma arising in a nevus, Breslow 1.0mm. e) Clinically asymmetric lesion on the trunk of a 19 year old boy. f) Dermoscopy: symmetric reticular-globular pattern, with atypical network, irregular pigmented globules and dots at the periphery and central blue-white veil. Melanoma arising in a nevus, Breslow 3.1mm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Pattern 3, Pink vascular Spitzoid pattern.
a) Clinically, hypomelanotic rapid growing tumor on a 14 year old girl. b) Dermoscopy: Polymorphic vascular pattern, with dotted vessels, milky red areas and remnants of pigment at the periphery, central shiny white structures. Spitzoid melanoma, Breslow 1.9 mm. c) Clinically, amelanotic pink bump on the lower limb of a 3 year old girl. d) Dermoscopy: Polymorphic vascular pattern, milky red areas and globules and shiny white structures. Spitzoid melanoma Breslow 5.5 mm e) Clinically ulcerated amelanotic bump on the lower limb of a 17 year old girl. f) Dermoscopy: Vascular pattern showing dotted vessels and milky red globules, and ulceration. Spitzoid melanoma, Breslow 1.9 mm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Pattern 4, Pigmented Spitzoid pattern.
a) Clinically, asymmetric polychromic lesion on the finger of a 4 year old boy. b) Dermoscopy: Multicomponent pattern on acral site, showing Spitzoid features with peripheral streaks, blue white veil in the center and multiple irregular black globules and dots. Spitzoid melanoma, Breslow 2.8 mm. c) Clinically, symmetric pigmented tumor on the lower limb of a 9 year old boy. d) Dermoscopy: Asymmetric globular pattern with ulceration, blue white veil and irregular black dots. Invasive Spitzoid melanoma e) Clinically pigmented lesion on the lower limb of a 17 year old girl. f) Dermoscopy: Asymmetric pigmented Spitzoid pattern, with irregular pseudopods, blue white veil, shiny white structures. Spitzoid melanoma, Breslow 0.42 mm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Campbell LB, Kreicher KL, Gittleman HR, Strodtbeck K, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Bordeaux JS. Melanoma Incidence in Children and Adolescents: Decreasing Trends in the United States. J Pediatr [Internet]. 2015. June [cited 2015 Aug 26];166(6):1505–13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25866386 - PubMed
    1. Han D, Zager JS, Han G, Marzban SS, Puleo CA, Sarnaik AA, et al. The unique clinical characteristics of melanoma diagnosed in children. Ann Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2012. November [cited 2016 Dec 5];19(12):3888–95. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22864798 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brecht IB, Garbe C, Gefeller O, Pfahlberg A, Bauer J, Eigentler TK, et al. 443 paediatric cases of malignant melanoma registered with the German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry between 1983 and 2011. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2015 May [cited 2015 Aug 26];51(7):861–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25794606 - PubMed
    1. Stanelle EJ, Busam KJ, Rich BS, Christison-Lagay ER, Dunkel IJ, Marghoob AA, et al. Early-stage non-Spitzoid cutaneous melanoma in patients younger than 22 years of age at diagnosis: long-term follow-up and survival analysis. J Pediatr Surg [Internet]. 2015. June [cited 2015 Jul 15];50(6):1019–23. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25819019 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Averbook BJ, Lee SJ, Delman KA, Gow KW, Zager JS, Sondak VK, et al. Pediatric melanoma: analysis of an international registry. Cancer [Internet]. 2013. November 15 [cited 2016 Dec 5];119(22):4012–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24022819 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms