Walkability, complete streets, and gender: Who benefits most?
- PMID: 29024906
- PMCID: PMC5690867
- DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.007
Walkability, complete streets, and gender: Who benefits most?
Abstract
Does street walkability and a new complete street renovation relate to street use and gender composition? We audited two mixed-walkability complete streets ("complete less-urban" and "complete-urban"), one low-walkable street, and one high-walkable street at pre-renovation and twice post-renovation. Complete street users increased, especially for the complete-less urban street. Typically, the high-walkable street attracted the most and the low-walkable street attracted the fewest total people, males, and females; complete streets were in between. On blocks with people, females were only 29% of users; females were much less common on low- walkable streets. Street improvements might enhance gender equity.
Keywords: Active travel; Built environment; Pedestrian; Sidewalk; Walking.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Badland H, Schofield G. Transport, urban design, and physical activity: an evidence-based update. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment. 2005;10:177–196.
-
- Bastomski S, Smith P. Gender, fear, and public places: how negative encounters with strangers harm women. Sex Roles. 2016:1–16.
-
- Boarnet MG, Day K, Alfonzo M, Forsyth A, Oakes M. The Irvine Minnesota Inventory to measure built environments: Reliability tests. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2006;30:153–159. - PubMed
-
- Boarnet MG, Forsyth A, Day K, Oakes JM. The Street Level Built Environment and Physical Activity and Walking: Results of a Predictive Validity Study for the Irvine Minnesota Inventory. Environment and Behavior. 2011;43:735–775.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
