Misconceptions on the use of MR-Egger regression and the evaluation of the InSIDE assumption
- PMID: 29025021
- PMCID: PMC5837449
- DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx192
Misconceptions on the use of MR-Egger regression and the evaluation of the InSIDE assumption
Comment on
-
Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):512-25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. Epub 2015 Jun 6. Int J Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 26050253 Free PMC article.
-
A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization.Stat Med. 2017 May 20;36(11):1783-1802. doi: 10.1002/sim.7221. Epub 2017 Jan 23. Stat Med. 2017. PMID: 28114746 Free PMC article.
-
A note on the use of Egger regression in Mendelian randomization studies.Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):2094-2097. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx191. Int J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 29025040 No abstract available.
References
-
- Slob EAW, Groenen PJF, Thurik AR, Rietveld CA. A note on the use of Egger regression in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:2094–97. - PubMed
-
- Hartwig FP, Davies NM. Why internal weights should be avoided (not only) in MR-Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 2016;45:1676–78. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources