Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Oct 12;7(1):13014.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13465-2.

Probiotic supplementation in preterm infants does not affect the risk of retinopathy of prematurity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Giacomo Cavallaro  1 , Eduardo Villamor-Martínez  2 , Luca Filippi  3 , Fabio Mosca  1 , Eduardo Villamor  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Probiotic supplementation in preterm infants does not affect the risk of retinopathy of prematurity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Giacomo Cavallaro et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vascular disorder of the developing retina in preterm infants and is a leading cause of childhood blindness. Perinatal infection plays a pathogenic role in ROP. Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of late onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants but it remains to be determined whether this reduction translates into a reduction of other complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the possible role of probiotics in altering the risk of ROP. Eleven randomized controlled trials (4250 infants; probiotics: 2121) were included in the meta-analysis that showed a significantly decreased rate of LOS with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.807 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.705 to 0.924 (P = 0.010; fixed effects model) but could not demonstrate a significant effect of probiotics on any stage ROP (RR 1.053, 95% CI 0.903 to 1.228, P = 0.508, 4 studies), or severe ROP (RR 0.841, 95% CI 0.666 to 1.063, P = 0.148, 9 studies). Meta-regression did not show any significant association between the RR for LOS and the RR for severe ROP. In conclusion, our results suggest that infection prevention by probiotics does not affect the risk of developing ROP in preterm infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of search strategy and study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot: Probiotic supplementation and risk of any stage retinopathy of prematurity. Fixed effects model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot: Probiotic supplementation and risk of severe retinopathy of prematurity. Fixed effects model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Funnel plot assessing publication bias for severe ROP.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Meta-regression of the relationship between the effects of probiotics on late onset sepsis and severe ROP.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Fang JL, et al. Interventions To Prevent Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20153387. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavallaro G, et al. The pathophysiology of retinopathy of prematurity: an update of previous and recent knowledge. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:2–20. doi: 10.1111/aos.12049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee J, Dammann O. Perinatal infection, inflammation, and retinopathy of prematurity. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17:26–29. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2011.08.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartnett ME, Penn JS. Mechanisms and management of retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2515–2526. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208129. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartnett ME, Lane RH. Effects of oxygen on the development and severity of retinopathy of prematurity. J. AAPOS. 2013;17:229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.12.155. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types