Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;36(1):73-78.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2099-0. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular seminomas: population-based practice and survival outcomes

Affiliations

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular seminomas: population-based practice and survival outcomes

Hiten D Patel et al. World J Urol. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: While retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is traditionally reserved for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, recent efforts to reduce long-term toxicities of radiation and chemotherapy have turned attention to its application for testicular seminomas. Currently, RPLND is reserved for the post-chemotherapy for stage II testicular seminomas; we aimed to describe current utilization of RPNLD for testicular seminomas by stage and implications for survival.

Methods: A national sample of men diagnosed with stage IA/IB/IS/IIA/IIB/IIC testicular seminoma (1988-2013) was evaluated from SEER Program registries. Stage-specific utilization of RPLND was determined. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, race, and radiotherapy, evaluated overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for the RPLND cohort. Adjusted models assessed predictors of RPLND.

Results: A total of 17,681 men (mean age 38.1 years) with testicular seminoma were included with low utilization of RPLND for stage I disease (1.3% overall) and higher rates for stage II disease (10.6% overall). There were no appreciable trends over time. Patients receiving RPLND did not appear to have worse OS or CSS on adjusted stage-by-stage analysis. Higher stage disease (IIA-IIC) was associated with greater need for RPLND while radiotherapy was associated with decreased use [OR 0.40 (0.32-0.51), p < 0.001].

Conclusions: Utilization of RPLND for testicular seminomas in the post-chemotherapy setting has remained stable over a 25-year period. Patients undergoing RPLND are a higher risk cohort but stage-by-stage survival outcomes appeared comparable to men not undergoing RPLND. Upcoming trials implementing RPLND as a first-line modality for testicular seminoma or isolated retroperitoneal relapse will help better quantify relative recurrence and survival.

Keywords: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; Testicular cancer; Testicular seminoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 1;31(28):3490-3 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2014 Nov;192(5):1397-402 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2013 Jun;63(6):1018-9; discussion 1020 - PubMed
    1. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Aug;13(4):e265-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):51-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources