Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 1;75(10):798-829.
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux037.

Acceptance and adoption of biofortified crops in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Elise F Talsma  1 , Alida Melse-Boonstra  1 , Inge D Brouwer  1
Affiliations

Acceptance and adoption of biofortified crops in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Elise F Talsma et al. Nutr Rev. .

Abstract

Biofortification of staple crops is a promising strategy for increasing the nutrient density of diets in order to improve human health. The willingness of consumers and producers to accept new crop varieties will determine whether biofortification can be successfully implemented. This review assessed sensory acceptance and adoption of biofortified crops and the determining factors for acceptance and adoption among consumers and producers in low- and middle-income countries. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for published reports. Unpublished studies were identified using an internet search. From a total of 1669 records found, 72 primary human research studies published in English or Spanish met the criteria for inclusion. : Data were extracted from each identified study using a standardized form. Sensory acceptability (n = 40) was the most common topic of the studies, followed by determinants of acceptance (n = 25) and adoption (n = 21). Of crops included in the studies, sweet potato and maize were the most studied, whereas rice and pearl-millet were the least investigated. Overall, sensory acceptance was good, and availability and information on health benefits of the crops were the most important determinants of acceptance and adoption. : Changes to the sensory qualities of a crop, including changes in color, did not act as an obstacle to acceptance of biofortified crops. Future studies should look at acceptance of biofortified crops after they have been disseminated and introduced on a wide-scale.

Keywords: acceptability; adoption; biofortified crops; micronutrients; nutrition-sensitive agriculture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the literature search process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bouis HE, Hotz C, McClafferty B. et al. Biofortification: a new tool to reduce micronutrient malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull. 2011;32(1 suppl.):31–40. - PubMed
    1. Ruel MT, Alderman H. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet. 2013;382:536–551. - PubMed
    1. Bouis H. Enrichment of food staples through plant breeding: a new strategy for fighting micronutrient malnutrition. Nutr Rev. 1996;54:131–137. - PubMed
    1. Solomons NW, Bulux J. Identification and production of local carotene-rich foods to combat vitamin A malnutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51(suppl 4):S39–S45. - PubMed
    1. Bouis HE, Welch RM. Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci. 2010;50:S20–S32.

Publication types