Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1125-1136.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx120.

A review of methods and databases for metagenomic classification and assembly

Review

A review of methods and databases for metagenomic classification and assembly

Florian P Breitwieser et al. Brief Bioinform. .

Abstract

Microbiome research has grown rapidly over the past decade, with a proliferation of new methods that seek to make sense of large, complex data sets. Here, we survey two of the primary types of methods for analyzing microbiome data: read classification and metagenomic assembly, and we review some of the challenges facing these methods. All of the methods rely on public genome databases, and we also discuss the content of these databases and how their quality has a direct impact on our ability to interpret a microbiome sample.

Keywords: bacteria; databases; microbial genomics; microbiome; next-generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Common analysis procedures for metagenomics data. Note that the order of some of the analysis steps can be shuffled. For example, reads might be binned before assembly or before taxonomic assignment, so that the downstream algorithms can work only with a subset of the data.

References

    1. Marchesi JR, Ravel J.. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome 2015;3:31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scholz M, Ward DV, Pasolli E, et al. Strain-level microbial epidemiology and population genomics from shotgun metagenomics. Nat Methods 2016;13:435–8. - PubMed
    1. Moran MA, Satinsky B, Gifford SM, et al. Sizing up metatranscriptomics. ISME J 2013;7:237–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldrian P, López-Mondéjar R.. Microbial genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics: new discoveries in decomposition research using complementary methods. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014;98:1531–7. - PubMed
    1. Wilmes P, Heintz-Buschart A, Bond PL.. A decade of metaproteomics: where we stand and what the future holds. Proteomics 2015;15:3409–17. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances