Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1560-1567.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx121.

PHAST, PHASTER and PHASTEST: Tools for finding prophage in bacterial genomes

Review

PHAST, PHASTER and PHASTEST: Tools for finding prophage in bacterial genomes

David Arndt et al. Brief Bioinform. .

Abstract

PHAST (PHAge Search Tool) and its successor PHASTER (PHAge Search Tool - Enhanced Release) have become two of the most widely used web servers for identifying putative prophages in bacterial genomes. Here we review the main capabilities of these web resources, provide some practical guidance regarding their use and discuss possible future improvements. PHAST, which was first described in 2011, made its debut just as whole bacterial genome sequencing and was becoming inexpensive and relatively routine. PHAST quickly gained popularity among bacterial genome researchers because of its web accessibility, its ease of use along with its enhanced accuracy and rapid processing times. PHASTER, which appeared in 2016, provided a number of much-needed enhancements to the PHAST server, including greater processing speed (to cope with very large submission volumes), increased database sizes, a more modern user interface, improved graphical displays and support for metagenomic submissions. Continuing developments in the field, along with increased interest in automated phage and prophage finding, have already led to several improvements to the PHASTER server and will soon lead to the development of a successor to PHASTER (to be called PHASTEST).

Keywords: bacterial genome; bioinformatics; metagenomics; phage; prophage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A montage of PHAST output images. A colour version of this figure is available at BIB online: https://academic.oup.com/bib.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A screenshot of PHASTER’s modernized user interface. A colour version of this figure is available at BIB online: https://academic.oup.com/bib.

References

    1. Fortier L-C, Sekulovic O.. Importance of prophages to evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens. Virulence 2013;4:354–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suttle CA. Viruses in the sea. Nature 2005;437:356–61. - PubMed
    1. Casjens S. Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far? Mol Microbiol 2003;49:277–300. - PubMed
    1. Little JW. Lysogeny, Prophage Induction, and Lysogenic Conversion In: Waldor MK, Friedman DI, Adhya SL (eds). Phages: Their Role in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Biotechnology. Washington: ASM Press, 2005, 37–54.
    1. Bobay L-M, Touchon M, Rocha EPC.. Pervasive domestication of defective prophages by bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:12127–32. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding