Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;10(10):e004257.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004257.

Dose-Dependent Effects of the Myosin Activator Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Cross-Bridge Behavior and Force Generation in Failing Human Myocardium

Affiliations

Dose-Dependent Effects of the Myosin Activator Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Cross-Bridge Behavior and Force Generation in Failing Human Myocardium

Ranganath Mamidi et al. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) enhances systolic function in vivo by directly binding the myosin cross-bridges (XBs) in the sarcomere. However, the mechanistic details governing OM-induced modulation of XB behavior in failing human myocardium are unclear.

Methods and results: The effects of OM on steady state and dynamic XB behavior were measured in chemically skinned myocardial preparations isolated from human donor and heart failure (HF) left ventricle. HF myocardium exhibited impaired contractile function as evidenced by reduced maximal force, magnitude of XB recruitment (Pdf), and a slowed rate of XB detachment (krel) at submaximal Ca2+ activations. Ca2+ sensitivity of force generation (pCa50) was higher in HF myocardium when compared with donor myocardium, both prior to and after OM incubations. OM incubation (0.5 and 1.0 μmol/L) enhanced force generation at submaximal Ca2+ activations in a dose-dependent manner. Notably, OM induced a slowing in krel with 1.0 μmol/L OM but not with 0.5 μmol/L OM in HF myocardium. Additionally, OM exerted other differential effects on XB behavior in HF myocardium as evidenced by a greater enhancement in Pdf and slowing in the time course of cooperative XB recruitment (Trec), which collectively prolonged achievement of peak force development (Tpk), compared with donor myocardium.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that OM augments force generation but also prolongs the time course of XB transitions to force-bearing states in remodeled HF myocardium, which may extend the systolic ejection time in vivo. Optimal OM dosing is critical for eliciting enhanced systolic function without excessive prolongation of systolic ejection time, which may compromise diastolic filling.

Keywords: heart failure; myocardium; omecamtiv mecarbil; sacromere; systolic function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phosphorylation of sarcomeric proteins and MHC expression in donor and HF myocardium
(A) Representative Coomassie stained (left) SDS gel and Pro-Q Diamond-stained (right) showing the expression and phosphorylation status of myofilament proteins in donor and HF samples. Cardiac samples isolated from 4 donor hearts and 4 failing hearts were used to analyze contractile protein expression and phosphorylation levels. (B) Quantification of phosphorylation of MyBP-C, TnT, and TnI in donor and HF samples. (C) Representative 5% Tris-HCl gel showing MHC isoform expression in donor and HF myocardium. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. * P < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of OM on force enhancements at variable [Ca2+] activations in donor and HF myocardium
Baseline forces produced by the skinned myocardial preparations were first measured in Ca2+ solutions producing a range of submaximal forces. Forces were measured at baseline or following a 2-minute incubation with 0.5μM or 1.0μM OM. The net increase in force generation from the untreated baseline (pre-OM) following OM incubation was calculated and is expressed as % increase in force from baseline. Force enhancements were pronounced at submaximal Ca2+ activation but declined as the level of Ca2+ was increased. 12 skinned myocardial preparations (3 fibers each from 4 hearts) were used for both groups. *, significant force enhancement from baseline level in donor and HF myocardium following 1.0μM OM incubation; †, significant force enhancement from baseline level in donor and HF myocardium following 0.5μM OM incubation. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of OM on pCa50 in donor and HF myocardium
Skinned myocardial preparations were exposed to a 2-minute incubation with 0.5 μM or 1.0μM OM. (A) Effect of OM on the force-pCa relationships in donor and HF myocardium. (B) Effect of OM on the force-pCa relationships in donor myocardium. (C) Effect of OM on the force-pCa relationships in HF myocardium. 12 skinned myocardial preparations (3 fibers each from 4 hearts) were used for both groups. *, pCa50 is significantly higher in HF when compared to the donor myocardium. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Representative stretch activation responses in donor and HF myocardium prior to and following OM incubations
Representative force responses are shown following a sudden 2% stretch in muscle length (ML) in isometrically-contracting donor (black traces), and HF (red traces) myocardial preparations prior to (A) and following incubation with 0.5μM OM (B) or 1.0μM OM (C). Expanded views are shown below panels A to C to demonstrate that krel is slower in HF myocardium compared to donor myocardium both prior to and following OM incubation. Insets below the expanded views depict the Trec region of the trace. The highlighted parts of the stretch activation traces (blue colored regions) in the insets show that the time required for XB recruitment, Trec, is prolonged post-OM incubations in the HF myocardium. Panel A highlights the important phases of the force transients and various stretch activation parameters that are measured from force responses to 2% stretch in ML (explained in methods section).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Effect of OM on the time required for XB recruitment (Trec) and time required to achieve the peak of force development (Tpk) in donor and HF myocardium
The effect of OM was measured by incubating myocardial preparations in 0.5μM or 1.0μM OM. (A) Trec prior to and following OM incubation in donor and HF myocardium. (B) Tpk prior to and following OM incubation in donor and HF myocardium. The supplement contains a description of how these parameters are measured. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. 12 skinned myocardial preparations (3 fibers each from 4 hearts) were used for both groups. *, different vs. the corresponding pre-OM group; †, different vs. the corresponding donor group. Asterisks indicate P < 0.05.

References

    1. Triposkiadis F, Giamouzis G, Parissis J, Starling RC, Boudoulas H, Skoularigis J, Butler J, Filippatos G. Reframing the association and significance of co-morbidities in heart failure. European journal of heart failure. 2016;18:744–758. - PubMed
    1. Greenberg B. Novel therapies for heart failure- where do they stand? Circulation journal. 2016;80:1882–1891. - PubMed
    1. Xie M, Burchfield JS, Hill JA. Pathological ventricular remodeling: Therapies: Part 2 of 2. Circulation. 2013;128:1021–1030. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tardiff JC, Carrier L, Bers DM, Poggesi C, Ferrantini C, Coppini R, Maier LS, Ashrafian H, Huke S, van der Velden J. Targets for therapy in sarcomeric cardiomyopathies. Cardiovascular research. 2015;105:457–470. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teerlink JR, Clarke CP, Saikali KG, Lee JH, Chen MM, Escandon RD, Elliott L, Bee R, Habibzadeh MR, Goldman JH, Schiller NB, Malik FI, Wolff AA. Dose-dependent augmentation of cardiac systolic function with the selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil: A first-in-man study. Lancet. 2011;378:667–675. - PubMed

MeSH terms