The long-term survival of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional study
- PMID: 29031947
- PMCID: PMC5896345
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.016
The long-term survival of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional study
Abstract
Objective: Our objective is to report the world's largest series with the longest follow-up of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: This was a multi-institutional retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients from 4 institutions' prospective robotic databases.
Results: There were 1339 patients (men 55%, median age 68 years). The median operative time was 136 minutes, median number of lymph nodes was 13 (5 N2 stations and 1 N1), median blood loss was 50 cc, and 4 (0.005%) patients received intraoperative transfusions. Conversions occurred in 116 patients (9%) and for bleeding in 24 (2%). Median length of stay was 3 days. Major morbidity occurred in 8%. The 30-day and 90-day operative mortality was 0.2% and 0.5%, respectively. Follow-up was complete in 99% of patients with a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1-154 months). The 5-year stage-specific survival was: 83% for the 672 patients with stage IA NSCLC, 77% for the 281 patients with stage IB, 68% for the 118 patients with stage IIA, 70% for 99 patients with IIB, 62% for 143 patients with stage IIIA (122 had N2 disease, 73%), and 31% for 8 patients with stage IIIB (none had N3 disease). The cumulative incidence of metastatic NSCLC was 15% (128 patients, 95% confidence interval, 13%-18%). The cumulative incidence of local recurrence in the ipsilateral operated chest was 3% only (26 patients, 95% confidence interval, 2%-5%).
Conclusions: The oncologic results of robotic lobectomy for NSCLC are promising, especially for patients with pathologic N2 disease. However, further follow-up and studies are needed.
Keywords: lung cancer; quality outcomes; robotic surgery; survival.
Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
If your hospital has RATS, do not exterminate.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):777. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.081. Epub 2017 Sep 23. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29042099 No abstract available.
-
To robot or not to robot: Is that really the question?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):787-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.102. Epub 2017 Nov 7. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29198799 No abstract available.
-
Roboterassistierte Lobektomie beim nichtkleinzelligen Bronchialkarzinom.Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Jun;143(3):226. doi: 10.1055/a-0603-5248. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Zentralbl Chir. 2018. PMID: 29933475 German. No abstract available.
-
Robotic lobectomy leads to excellent survival in lung cancer patients.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(Suppl 26):S3184-S3185. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.123. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30370108 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
RATS: a word is enough to the wise.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(Suppl 26):S3244-S3245. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.120. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30370126 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Refocusing the quality lens to examine real-life value.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Sep;10(Suppl 26):S3276-S3277. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.08.107. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 30370136 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Long-term outcomes and quality of life should be the future focus of research measuring effectiveness of lung cancer surgery approaches.J Thorac Dis. 2019 Feb;11(2):361-363. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.139. J Thorac Dis. 2019. PMID: 30962974 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–44. - PubMed
-
- Radkani P, Joshi D, Barot T, Williams RF. Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection for lung tumors: a community tertiary care center experience over four years. Surg Endosc. 2015;30:619–24. - PubMed
-
- Kanagarajah P, Torres A, Bacigalupo A, Shaukat S, Myslicki LA, Williams R. Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection: comparison of outcomes and learning curve from a single surgeon in a tertiary care center. In: C79. Multimodality approaches to diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:A6022.
-
- Lacroix V, Nezhad Z, Kahn D, Steyaert A, Poncelet A, Pieters T, et al. Pain, quality of life, and clinical outcomes after robotic lobectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:344–50. - PubMed
-
- Toker A, Özyurtkan MO, Kaba E, Ayalp K, Demirhan Ö, Uyumaz E. Robotic anatomic lung resections: the initial experience and description of learning in 102 cases. Surg Endosc. 2016;2:676–83. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical