Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;37(6 Pt A):2045-2053.
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

The combination of dynapenia and abdominal obesity as a risk factor for worse trajectories of IADL disability among older adults

Affiliations

The combination of dynapenia and abdominal obesity as a risk factor for worse trajectories of IADL disability among older adults

Tiago da Silva Alexandre et al. Clin Nutr. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background/objectives: The concept of dynapenic obesity has been gaining great attention recently. However, there is little epidemiological evidence demonstrating that dynapenic abdominal obese individuals have worse trajectories of disability than those with dynapenia and abdominal obesity alone. Our aim was to investigate whether dynapenia combined with abdominal obesity can result in worse trajectories of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) among English and Brazilian older adults over eight and ten years of follow-up, respectively.

Methods: We used longitudinal data from 3374 participants from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and 1040 participants from the Brazilian Health, Well-being and Aging Study (SABE) who were free from disability as assessed by IADL at baseline. IADL disability was defined herein as a difficulty to perform the following: preparing meals, managing money, using transportation, shopping, using the telephone, house cleaning, washing clothes, and taking medications according to the Lawton IADL modified scale. The study population in each country was categorized into non-dynapenic/non-abdominal obese (reference group), abdominal obese, dynapenic and dynapenic abdominal obese according to their handgrip strength (<26 kg for men and <16 kg for women) and waist circumference (>102 cm for men and >88 cm for women). We used generalized linear mixed models with IADL as the outcome.

Results: The estimated change over time in IADL disability was significantly higher for participants with dynapenic abdominal obesity compared to those with neither condition in both cohorts (ELSA: +0.023, 95% CI = 0.012-0.034, p < 0.001; SABE: +0.065, 95% CI = 0.038-0.091, p < 0.001). Abdominal obesity was also associated with changes over time in IADL disability (ELSA: +0.009, 95% CI = 0.002-0.015, p < 0.05; SABE: +0.021, 95% CI = 0.002-0.041, p < 0.05), which was not observed for dynapenia.

Conclusions: Abdominal obesity is an important risk factor for IADL decline but participants with dynapenic abdominal obesity had the highest rates of IADL decline over time among English and Brazilian older adults.

Keywords: Disability; Dynapenia; Handgrip; Obesity; Waist circumference; Weakness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trajectories of IADL disability according to dynapenia and abdominal obesity status –ELSA study 2004–2012. Predictions for age 60–69, male, married, household wealth = 5th quintile, schooling = higher than A level, drank never or rarely, never smoked, no sedentary lifestyle, no hypertension, no diabetes, no cancer, no lung disease, no heart disease, no stroke, no osteoarthritis, no falls, good perception of vision, good perception of hearing, CESD <4 points, Mean Memory Score = 20 and body mass index = 18.5 kg/m2.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trajectories of IADL disability according to dynapenia and abdominal obesity status – SABE study 2000–2010. Predictions for age 60–69, male, married, income > US$ 423.5, schooling = 16 years, drank never or rarely, never smoked, no sedentary lifestyle, no hypertension, no diabetes, no cancer, no lung disease, no heart disease, no stroke, no osteoarthritis, no falls, no hospitalization in previous 12 months, good perception of vision, good perception of hearing, GDS <5 points, MMSE ≥ 13 points and body mass index = 18.5 kg/m2.

References

    1. Frederiksen H, Hjelmborg J, Mortensen J, McGue M, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. Age trajectories of grip strength: cross-sectional and longitudinal data among 8,342 Danes aged 46 to 102. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16:554–62. - PubMed
    1. Keevil VL, Luben R, Dalzell N, Hayat S, Sayer AA, Wareham NJ, et al. Cross-sectional association between different measures of obesity and muscle strength in men and women in a British Cohort Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2015;19(1):3–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt M, Schwartz AV, et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass and quality in older adults: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci. 2006;61(10):1059–64. - PubMed
    1. Al Snih S, Markides K, Ottenbacher KJ, Raji MA. Hand grip strength and incident ADL disability in elderly Mexican Americans over a seven-year period. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(6):481–6. - PubMed
    1. Al Snih S, Markides K, Ray L, Ostir GV, Goodwin JS. Handgrip strength and mortality in older Mexican Americans. JAGS. 2002;50(7):1250–6. - PubMed

Publication types