Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep 29:7:429.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00429. eCollection 2017.

Deciphering Babesia-Vector Interactions

Affiliations
Review

Deciphering Babesia-Vector Interactions

Sandra Antunes et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Understanding host-pathogen-tick interactions remains a vitally important issue that might be better understood by basic research focused on each of the dyad interplays. Pathogens gain access to either the vector or host during tick feeding when ticks are confronted with strong hemostatic, inflammatory and immune responses. A prominent example of this is the Babesia spp.-tick-vertebrate host relationship. Babesia spp. are intraerythrocytic apicomplexan organisms spread worldwide, with a complex life cycle. The presence of transovarial transmission in almost all the Babesia species is the main difference between their life cycle and that of other piroplasmida. With more than 100 species described so far, Babesia are the second most commonly found blood parasite of mammals after trypanosomes. The prevalence of Babesia spp. infection is increasing worldwide and is currently classified as an emerging zoonosis. Babesia microti and Babesia divergens are the most frequent etiological agents associated with human babesiosis in North America and Europe, respectively. Although the Babesia-tick system has been extensively researched, the currently available prophylactic and control methods are not efficient, and chemotherapeutic treatment is limited. Studying the molecular changes induced by the presence of Babesia in the vector will not only elucidate the strategies used by the protozoa to overcome mechanical and immune barriers, but will also contribute toward the discovery of important tick molecules that have a role in vector capacity. This review provides an overview of the identified molecules involved in Babesia-tick interactions, with an emphasis on the fundamentally important ones for pathogen acquisition and transmission.

Keywords: Babesia spp.; babesiosis; tick-borne diseases; tick-pathogen interaction; vector.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram representing tick molecules implicated in Babesia spp. acquisition and transmission by the vector. When ticks feed on Babesia-infected animals, parasites within red blood cellsreach and penetrate the tick midgut peritrophic membrane to invade the epithelial cells (in the figure center). Once these cells are infected, transcriptional factors, such as subolesin, can regulate protein expression in several cellular pathways, facilitating Babesia infection. In the microvilli of the midgut cells, parasite zygotes will probably interact with a tick glycoprotein (Bm86) and a tick receptor of the outer surface protein A (TROSPA). Inside the epithelial cells, mitochondria porins (VDAC) can bind to Babesia kinete proteins promoting plasminogen activation in the cell surface, allowing their passage to the haemolymph. Once here, the haemocytes can phagocyte circulating parasites and the tick antimicrobial molecules such as, longicin, micropulsin, longipain, LRR-domain and Kunitz-type protease inhibitors are activated potentially reducing the infection in the vector. If the infectious parasites surpass these barriers of defense, they will be capable to spread across the tissues and invade ovaries (represented in the bottom of the figure) and SGs (represented in the top of the figure). In the ovary, the interaction of Babesia molecules with tick vitellogenin and TROSPA receptors may contribute for the occurrence of transovarial transmission; while in the SGs, Babesia interacts with TROSPA and calreticulin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almazán C., Kocan K. M., Bergman D. K., Garcia-Garcia J. C., Blouin E. F., de la Fuente J. (2003). Identification of protective antigens for the control of Ixodes scapularis infestations using cDNA expression library immunization. Vaccine 21, 1492–1501. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00683-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alzan H. F., Lau A. O., Knowles D. P., Herndon D. R., Ueti M. W., Scoles G. A., et al. (2016). Expression of 6-Cys gene superfamily defines Babesia bovis sexual stage development within Rhipicephalus microplus. PLoS ONE 11:e0163791. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163791 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anatriello E., Ribeiro J. M. C., de Miranda-Santos I. K. F., Brandao L. G., Anderson J. M., Valenzuela J. G., et al. (2010). An insight into the sialotranscriptome of the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. BMC Genomics 11:450. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-450 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antunes S., Galindo R. C., Almazan C., Rudenko N., Golovchenko M., Grubhoffer L., et al. (2012). Functional genomics studies of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus ticks in response to infection with the cattle protozoan parasite, Babesia bigemina. Int. J. Parasitol. 42, 187–195. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.12.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antunes S., Merino O., Lerias J., Domingues N., Mosqueda J., de la Fuente J., et al. (2015). Artificial feeding of Rhipicephalus microplus female ticks with anti calreticulin serum do not influence tick and Babesia bigemina acquisition. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 6, 47–55. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.09.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources