Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017:21:16-115.
doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-115.

Use of Epidural Analgesia as an Adjunct in Elective Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Review of 4983 Cases

Efstathios Karamanos  1 , Sophie Dream  2 , Anthony Falvo  3 , Nathan Schmoekel  4 , Aamir Siddiqui  5
Affiliations
Review

Use of Epidural Analgesia as an Adjunct in Elective Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Review of 4983 Cases

Efstathios Karamanos et al. Perm J. 2017.

Abstract

Context: Use of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing elective abdominal wall reconstruction is common.

Objective: To assess the impact of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction.

Design: All patients who underwent elective ventral hernia repair from 2005 to 2014 were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into two groups by the postoperative use of epidural analgesics as an adjunct analgesic method. Preoperative comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, operative findings, postoperative pain management, and venothromboembolic prophylaxis were extracted from the database. Logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of epidural use.

Main outcome measures: Severity of pain on postoperative days 1 and 2.

Results: During the study period, 4983 patients were identified. Of those, 237 patients (4.8%) had an epidural analgesic placed. After adjustment for differences between groups, use of epidural analgesia was associated with significantly lower rates of 30-day presentation to the Emergency Department (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.87, adjusted p = 0.01). Use of epidural analgesia resulted in higher odds of abscess development (AOR = 5.89, CI = 2.00-17.34, adjusted p < 0.01) and transfusion requirement (AOR = 2.92, CI = 1.34-6.40, adjusted p < 0.01). Use of epidural analgesia resulted in a significantly lower pain score on postoperative day 1 (3 vs 4, adjusted p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Use of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction may result in longer hospital stay and higher incidence of complications while having no measurable positive clinical impact on pain control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement

The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A single center experience. Hernia. 2006 Jun;10(3):236–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0072-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ching SS, Sarela AI, Dexter SP, Hayden JD, McMahon MJ. Comparison of early outcomes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair between nonobese and morbidly obese patient populations. Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2244–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0039-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ujiki MB, Weinberger J, Varghese TK, Murayama KM, Joehl RJ. One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov;188(5):593–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.07.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verbo A, Petito L, Manno A, et al. Laparoscopic approach to recurrent incisional hernia repair: A 3-year experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Oct;17(5):591–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.0133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stickel M, Rentsch M, Clevert DA, et al. Laparoscopic mesh repair of incisional hernia: An alternative to the conventional open repair? Hernia. 2007 Jun;11(3):217–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0201-z. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources