Cancer Screening Reminders: Addressing the Spectrum of Patient Preferences
- PMID: 29035189
- PMCID: PMC5638633
- DOI: 10.7812/TPP/17-051
Cancer Screening Reminders: Addressing the Spectrum of Patient Preferences
Abstract
Context: Health care systems continue to seek evidence about how to optimize the efficiency and effectiveness of cancer screening reminders. Annual reminders to receive preventive services can be an efficient strategy.
Objective: To understand patient motivators and barriers to cancer screening and preferences about reminder strategies.
Design: We conducted 11 focus groups among adults recommended for cancer screening within Kaiser Permanente Washington. We held separate focus groups with women aged 21 to 49 years, women 50 to 75 years, and men 50 to 75 years. We used an inductive, validated coding scheme for analysis.
Main outcome measures: Motivators and barriers to obtaining recommended cancer screening and general cancer screening reminder content and modality preferences.
Results: Half of our participants were women aged 50 to 75 years, and 25% were men aged 50 to 75 years. Differences by age, sex, insurance status, financial status, and health beliefs all drove the participants' preferences for whether they seek these recommended services and how and when they wish to be reminded about recommended cancer screening. Most participants preferred personalized reminders, and many favored receiving reminders less than 3 months before the recommended procedure date rather than a consolidated annual reminder. Younger participants more commonly requested electronic reminders, such as texts and e-mails.
Conclusion: Optimizing cancer screening reminders within a health care system involves a multifaceted approach that enables members to request which form of reminder they prefer (eg, electronic, paper, telephone) and the timing with which they want to be reminded, while staying affordable and manageable to the health care system.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.Prev Med. 2017 Sep;102:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 24. Prev Med. 2017. PMID: 28655547 Free PMC article.
-
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 9;12:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-176. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22404911 Free PMC article.
-
Appointment reminder systems and patient preferences: Patient technology usage and familiarity with other service providers as predictive variables.Health Informatics J. 2013 Jun;19(2):79-90. doi: 10.1177/1460458212458429. Health Informatics J. 2013. PMID: 23715208
-
Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial.J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):857-868. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.170369. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018. PMID: 30413542 Clinical Trial.
-
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 18;12(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31858588 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00353-8. Implement Sci Commun. 2022. PMID: 36199098 Free PMC article.
-
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40110911
-
Refill Reminder Preference and Inhaled Corticosteroid Adherence Among Patients with Asthma.Perm J. 2020 Nov;24:1-8. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.199. Perm J. 2020. PMID: 33482949 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Current developments in delivering customized care: a scoping review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 13;21(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06576-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34120603 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between False-Positive Results and Return to Screening Mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.Ann Intern Med. 2024 Oct;177(10):1297-1307. doi: 10.7326/M24-0123. Epub 2024 Sep 3. Ann Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39222505 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2015–2016 [Internet] Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2017. [cited 2017 Apr 14]. Available from: www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statisti....
-
- Nelson HD, Cantor A, Humphrey L, et al. Screening for breast cancer: A systematic review to update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Jan, Report No. 14-05201-EF-1. - PubMed
-
- Vesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: A systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. May, Report No. 11-05156-EF-1. - PubMed
-
- Humphrey L, Deffebach M, Pappas M, et al. Screening for lung cancer: Systematic review to update the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. Jul, Report No. 13-05188-EF-1. - PubMed
-
- Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: A systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Jun, Report No. 14-05203-EF-1. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources