The acute physiological stress response to driving: A systematic review
- PMID: 29036199
- PMCID: PMC5642886
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185517
The acute physiological stress response to driving: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: The experience of driving has been suggested to be detrimental to health. One hypothesis is that each exposure elicits an acute stress response, and that repeated exposures may act as a chronic stressor.
Objective: The aim of this review is to evaluate and synthesise the evidence on whether driving elicits an acute physiological stress response.
Methods: Electronic databases, including CINAHL, PsycINFO and Medline, were searched for original articles written in English from database inception until March 2016. The inclusion criteria of this review included a quantitative examination of an acute physiological stress response to driving, in either on-road or simulated settings, compared to a comparison or control condition. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting criteria.
Results: A total of 27,295 abstracts were screened and 28 full-text manuscripts retrieved. Of these, seven articles met the inclusion criteria including four simulator studies and three on-road studies. All suggested a significant change in at least one physiological outcome, but the strongest evidence was for increases in urine catecholamine and cortisol after driving for long hours on-road; results on other outcomes are limited by the small number of studies or inconsistent findings.
Conclusions: Overall, these studies provided moderate evidence to suggest that driving for long hours elicits a stress response over an extended period of time. There is insufficient evidence that driving for a shorter period of time elicits an acute stress response, especially in real, on-road tasks. However, the limited number of studies, small sample sizes, heterogeneity in study objectives, methodologies and physiological outcomes limit conclusions. Future studies could be improved by recruiting a larger sample, utilizing modern stress markers such as heart rate variability, and primarily focusing on the acute physiological stress response to on-road driving.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Australian Psychological Society. Stress and wellbeing: how Australians are coping with life. 2015 [accessed 12 Oct 2016]. https://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/PW15-SR.pdf.
-
- Lyons G, Chatterjee K. A human perspective on the daily commute: costs, benefits and trade-offs. Transp Rev. 2008;28(2):181–98. doi: 10.1080/01441640701559484 - DOI
-
- McCormack GR, Virk JS. Driving towards obesity: a systematized literature review on the association between motor vehicle travel time and distance and weight status in adults. Prev Med. 2014;66:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Frank LD, Andresen MA, Schmid TL. Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(2):87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
