Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 16;3(4):e73.
doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7424.

Implications of Attrition in a Longitudinal Web-Based Survey: An Examination of College Students Participating in a Tobacco Use Study

Bennett McDonald  1 , Regine Haardoerfer  1 , Michael Windle  1 , Michael Goodman  1 , Carla Berg #  1
Affiliations

Implications of Attrition in a Longitudinal Web-Based Survey: An Examination of College Students Participating in a Tobacco Use Study

Bennett McDonald et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

Background: Web-based survey research has several benefits, including low cost and burden, as well as high use of the Internet, particularly among young adults. In the context of longitudinal studies, attrition raises concerns regarding the validity of data, given the potential associations with individual and institutional characteristics, or the focal area of study (eg, cigarette use).

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare baseline characteristics of nonresponders versus responders in a sample of young adult college students in a Web-based longitudinal study regarding tobacco use.

Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of 3189 college students from seven Georgia colleges and universities in a 2-year longitudinal study. We examined baseline tobacco use, as well as individual- and institutional-level factors, as predictors of attrition between wave 1 (October and November 2014) and wave 2 (February and March 2015) using multilevel modeling. Results: A total 13.14% (419/3189) participants were lost to follow-up at wave 2. Predictors of nonresponse were similar in the models examining individual-level factors and institutional-level factors only and included being black versus white (odds ratio [OR] 1.74, CI 1.23-2.46); being male versus female (OR 1.41, CI 1.10-1.79); seeking a bachelor's degree versus advanced degree (OR 1.41, CI 1.09-1.83); not residing on campus (OR 0.62, CI 0.46-0.84); past 30-day tobacco use (OR 1.41, CI 1.10-1.78); attending a nonprivate college (OR 0.48, CI 0.33-0.71); and attending a college with ≤10,000 students (OR 0.56, CI 0.43-0.73).

Conclusions: Future longitudinal studies should assess predictors of attrition to examine how survey topic and other individual and institutional factors might influence the response to allow for correction of selection bias.

Keywords: methods; risk factors; surveys and questionnaires; tobacco use; young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):643–53. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. J Am Med Assoc. 2012 May 02;307(17):1805–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3532. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, Tuithof M, ten Have M. Sociodemographic and psychiatric predictors of attrition in a prospective psychiatric epidemiological study among the general population. Result of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2. Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;54(8):1131–9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.05.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halbesleben JR, Whitman MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):913–30. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12002. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23046097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoeni RF, Stafford F, McGonagle KA, Andreski P. Response Rates in National Panel Surveys. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2013 Jan;645(1):60–87. doi: 10.1177/0002716212456363. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23358122 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources