Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 21;62(1):e01899-17.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01899-17. Print 2018 Jan.

Urinary Tract Conditions Affect Fosfomycin Activity against Escherichia coli Strains Harboring Chromosomal Mutations Involved in Fosfomycin Uptake

Affiliations

Urinary Tract Conditions Affect Fosfomycin Activity against Escherichia coli Strains Harboring Chromosomal Mutations Involved in Fosfomycin Uptake

G Martín-Gutiérrez et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

The steps by which Escherichia coli strains harboring mutations related to fosfomycin (FOS) resistance arise and spread during urinary tract infections (UTIs) are far from being understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of urine, pH, and anaerobiosis on FOS activity against a set of isogenic strains carrying the most prevalent chromosomal mutations conferring FOS resistance (ΔuhpT, ΔglpT, ΔcyaA, and ΔptsI), either singly or in combination. We also studied fosfomycin-resistant E. coli clinical isolates from patients with UTI. Our results demonstrate that urinary tract physiological conditions might have a profound impact on FOS activity against strains with chromosomal FOS resistance mutations. Specifically, acidic pH values and anaerobiosis convert most of the strains categorized as resistant to fosfomycin according to the international guidelines to a susceptible status. Therefore, urinary pH values may have practical interest in the management of UTIs. Finally, our results, together with the high fitness cost associated with FOS resistance mutations, might explain the low prevalence of fosfomycin-resistant E. coli variants in UTIs.

Keywords: Escherichia coli; UTI; chromosomal mutations; fosfomycin activity; fosfomycin resistance; urinary tract infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
In vitro maximal growth rates (ΔOD per hour) for strain BW25113 and 10 isogenic LLFR and FOS-resistant strains in MH broth and urine at different pH values. Error bars represent interquartile ranges. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (P < 0.05 [Mann-Whitney U test]) between the indicated strains and wild-type strain BW25113 under the same conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Castañeda-García A, Blázquez J, Rodríguez-Rojas A. 2013. Molecular mechanisms and clinical impact of acquired and intrinsic fosfomycin resistance. Antibiotics 2:217–236. doi:10.3390/antibiotics2020217. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hendlin D, Stapley EO, Jackson M, Wallick H, Miller AK, Wolf FJ, Miller TW, Chaiet L, Kahan FM, Foltz EL, Woodruff HB, Mata JM, Hernandez S, Mochales S. 1969. Phosphonomycin, a new antibiotic produced by strains of streptomyces. Science 166:122–123. doi:10.1126/science.166.3901.122. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keating GM. 2013. Fosfomycin trometamol: a review of its use as a single-dose oral treatment for patients with acute lower urinary tract infections and pregnant women with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Drugs 73:1951–1966. doi:10.1007/s40265-013-0143-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Michalopoulos A, Virtzili S, Rafailidis P, Chalevelakis G, Damala M, Falagas ME. 2010. Intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:184–186. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02921.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Falagas ME, Vouloumanou EK, Samonis G, Vardakas KZ. 2016. Fosfomycin. Clin Microbiol Rev 29:321–347. doi:10.1128/CMR.00068-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms