Individual and environmental correlates of objectively measured sedentary time in Dutch and Belgian adults
- PMID: 29040315
- PMCID: PMC5645140
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186538
Individual and environmental correlates of objectively measured sedentary time in Dutch and Belgian adults
Abstract
As the detrimental health effects of sedentary behaviour are well established, insight into the individual and environmental factors that influence adults' sedentary behaviour is needed. Most studies to date rely on self-reported measures of sedentary time. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to examine individual and environmental correlates of objectively measured sedentary time in Dutch and Belgian adults. Between March and August 2014, Belgian (n = 133) and Dutch (n = 223) adults, recruited as sub-sample of the SPOTLIGHT survey, wore an ActiGraph accelerometer to provide objectively measured sedentary and moderate to vigorous physical activity time. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic (country of residence, age, gender and educational level), lifestyle (sleep, smoking, sugar-containing beverage consumption, alcohol intake), health (body mass index, self-rated health), work (employment status and type of work), happiness, physical environmental (owning a car, number of screens, socioeconomic status and residential density) and social environmental factors (social network, social cohesion). Univariate and multivariable regression analyses showed that Belgian participants had a lower odds of being sedentary for at least 9 hours per day compared to Dutch participants. Women, older participants and those meeting the WHO recommendation for physical activity were also less likely to sit for 9 hours or more per day. Participants doing (heavy) manual work or being in education, homemaker, unemployed had lower odds of being sedentary for at least 9 hours per day compared to participants with a sitting job. Those with a higher self-reported social network also had lower odds for sedentary time. No associations between physical and other social environmental characteristics and sedentary time were found. Our findings add to the growing evidence of factors associated with prolonged sedentary time in adults. These findings may be used to inform the development of strategies and interventions aimed at reducing sedentary time, and to identify high risk groups.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Objectively measured physical environmental neighbourhood factors are not associated with accelerometer-determined total sedentary time in adults.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jul 14;14(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0551-6. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017. PMID: 28705186 Free PMC article.
-
Neighborhood walkability and sedentary time in Belgian adults.Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jul;39(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.004. Am J Prev Med. 2010. PMID: 20547277
-
Recent temporal trends in sleep duration, domain-specific sedentary behaviour and physical activity. A survey among 25-79-year-old Danish adults.Scand J Public Health. 2013 Nov;41(7):706-11. doi: 10.1177/1403494813493151. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Scand J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23798478
-
A systematic review of the association between sedentary behaviors with frailty.Exp Gerontol. 2018 Dec;114:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Exp Gerontol. 2018. PMID: 30355522
-
Correlates of sedentary behaviour in university students: A systematic review.Prev Med. 2018 Nov;116:194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 30266213
Cited by
-
Seasonal Changes in Continuous Sedentary Behavior in Community-Dwelling Japanese Adults: A Pilot Study.Medicines (Basel). 2020 Aug 25;7(9):48. doi: 10.3390/medicines7090048. Medicines (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32854389 Free PMC article.
-
Lifestyle behaviours are not associated with haemolysis: results from Donor InSight.Blood Transfus. 2020 Mar;18(2):86-95. doi: 10.2450/2019.0151-19. Epub 2019 Oct 21. Blood Transfus. 2020. PMID: 31657707 Free PMC article.
-
The Physical Activity Patterns among Rural Chinese Adults: Data from China National Nutrition and Health Survey in 2010⁻2012.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 9;15(5):941. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050941. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29747391 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and correlates of domain-specific sedentary time of adults in the Netherlands: findings from the 2006 Dutch time use survey.BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(Suppl 2):538. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6764-7. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31159760 Free PMC article.
-
Influences on physical activity and screen time amongst postpartum women with heightened depressive symptoms: a qualitative study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 May 15;21(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03847-w. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 33992072 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet 2016. July 27. - PubMed
-
- Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)—Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017. June 10;14(1):75 doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rhodes RE, Mark RS, Temmel CP. Adult sedentary behavior: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2012. March;42(3):e3–28. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.020 - DOI - PubMed
-
- O'Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg H, Bernaards C, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach. BMC Public Health 2016;16:163 doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2841-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials