Clinical outcomes and predictors of patient satisfaction in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: Results from a retrospective multicentre study
- PMID: 29042032
- DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.003
Clinical outcomes and predictors of patient satisfaction in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: Results from a retrospective multicentre study
Abstract
Background: The optimal treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (Robinson Type 2B1 & 2B2) in adults remains controversial. Little is known about patient satisfaction with treatment for this type of injury. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and explore predictors of patient satisfaction after nonoperative and direct-operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults.
Methods: A retrospective multicentre study was conducted. Clinical data were retrieved from electronic patient charts. A questionnaire informing on current subjective function (QuickDASH), pain levels (VAS), health-related quality of life (Eq-5D-5L), impact on employment and satisfaction with treatment results was sent to all patients. Univariate and multivariate linear regression was performed to identify predictors of satisfaction.
Results: A total of 278 patients were identified (nonoperative n=150, direct-operative n=128). 67% of eligible patients returned the questionnaire. Median questionnaire follow-up was 2.1 years. No differences were found between groups for QuickDASH, Eq-5D-5L or pain VAS scores. Impaired union was observed in 13.2% of nonoperative cases vs. 2.3% in the direct-operative group. Patients in the nonoperative group could resume work after a median of 30.0days, compared to 13.5days in the direct-operative group. Patient satisfaction was higher in the direct-operative group, 8/10 vs. 7/10 for overall treatment results respectively. Patients' rating for the level of shared decision-making was the main predictor of overall satisfaction.
Conclusion: Direct-operative management led to higher patient satisfaction, despite similar long-term patient reported outcomes with nonoperative treatment. Patients' rating for the level of shared decision-making was the main predictor of overall satisfaction. This study highlights the need to enhance communication to facilitate shared decision-making.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33(11):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001580. J Orthop Trauma. 2019. PMID: 31633645
-
Long-term Functional Outcomes and Complications in Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Retrospective Comparative Study.J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 May-Jun 01;41(5):279-283. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001768. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021. PMID: 33606445
-
Mid-Term Patient Satisfaction and Residual Symptoms After Plate Fixation or Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Nov;32(11):e435-e439. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001269. J Orthop Trauma. 2018. PMID: 30086036 Clinical Trial.
-
Is There a Deficit After Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment of Shortened Midshaft Clavicular Fractures in Adolescents?J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Jun;37(4):227-233. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000627. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017. PMID: 26327404
-
Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Surgery Provides Better Results as Compared With Nonoperative Treatment: A Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3541-3551. doi: 10.1177/0363546519826961. Epub 2019 Mar 5. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30835150
Cited by
-
Factors Affecting Patient Decision-Making Regarding Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Treatment.Cureus. 2020 Sep 17;12(9):e10505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10505. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33094047 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for refracture after plate removal for midshaft clavicle fracture after bone union.J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 21;14(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1516-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31864405 Free PMC article.
-
DO THE CHANGES OF SCAPULOTHORACIC ANGLE AFFECT WINGED SCAPULA DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONAL SCORES DURING CLAVICLE FRACTURE TREATMENT?Acta Ortop Bras. 2022 May 23;30(spe1):e247742. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220223001e247742. eCollection 2022. Acta Ortop Bras. 2022. PMID: 35864828 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with Figure-of-Eight Bandage: The Impact of Residual Shortening on Shoulder Function.J Pers Med. 2022 May 7;12(5):759. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050759. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35629181 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES Int. 2020 May 4;4(2):256-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.010. eCollection 2020 Jun. JSES Int. 2020. PMID: 32490412 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical