Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct 3:10:4829-4839.
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S141968. eCollection 2017.

Comparison of microwave ablation and hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Comparison of microwave ablation and hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Manka Zhang et al. Onco Targets Ther. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Hepatic resection (HRN) and microwave ablation (MWA) have significant advantages in treating hepatocellular carcinoma; however, it remains unclear which way produces better outcomes. This meta-analysis of cohort studies compared the treatments in terms of effectiveness and safety.

Methods: Six electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and The Cochrane Library) were retrieved for studies comparing MWA and HRN. The meta-analysis was conducted based on statement of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1,480 patients. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between the MWA group and the HRN group (HR =0.98, 95% CI =0.76-1.26, P=0.878). There was no difference in disease-free survival between the MWA group and the HRN group (HR =1.16, 95% CI =0.79-1.71, P=0.442). Meanwhile, the meta-analysis demonstrated that MWA was associated with shorter operation time (standardized mean difference [SMD] =-1.37, 95% CI =-1.92 to -0.81, P=0.000), less amount of blood loss in operation (SWD =-1.19, 95% CI =-1.76 to -0.61, P=0.000), and less complications (OR =0.22, 95% CI =0.12-0.40, P=0.000) than HRN.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that MWA may be superior to HRN as it is as effective as HRN in terms of overall survival, disease-free survival, tumor recurrence, and is associated with shorter operation time, less amount of blood loss, and fewer complications.

Keywords: hepatic resection; microwave ablation; primary hepatic carcinoma; survival analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart showing selection of studies for meta-analysis. Abbreviations: MWA, microwave ablation; HRN, hepatic resection; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Abbreviations: MWA, microwave ablation; OS, overall survival; HRN, hepatic resection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in OS. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; SE, standard error.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparison of patients with HCC <3 cm. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparison of PMCT with HRN. Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MWA, microwave ablation; OS, overall survival; PMCT, percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy; HRN, hepatic resection.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the OS between MWA and HRN (pooled with OR). Abbreviations: MWA, microwave ablation; OS, overall survival; HRN, hepatic resection.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Note: Weights are from random effects analysis. Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; MWA, microwave ablation; HRN, hepatic resection.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in DFS. Abbreviation: DFS, disease-free survival.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparing the patients with HCC smaller than 3 cm. Weights are from random effects analysis. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the DFS between MWA and HRN (pooled with HR). Comparing PMCT with HRN. Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MWA, microwave ablation; PMCT, percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy; HRN, hepatic resection.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing the tumor recurrence between MWA and HRN (pooled with OR). Abbreviations: MWA, microwave ablation; HRN, hepatic resection.
Figure 10
Figure 10
(A) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing operation time between MWA and HRN. (B) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing blood loss between MWA and HRN. (C) Forest plot of meta-analysis comparing complication between MWA and HRN. Weights are from random effects analyses. Abbreviations: MWA, microwave ablation; SMD, standardized mean difference; HRN, hepatic resection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Melissa M, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90. - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Rebecca L, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. - PubMed
    1. Wong R, Frenette C. Updates in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2011;7(1):16–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishizawa T, Hasegawa K, Aoki T, et al. Neither multiple tumors nor portal hypertension are surgical contraindications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(7):1908–1916. - PubMed
    1. Gravante G, Overton J, Sorge R, et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for liver tumours: an evidence-based approach to retrospective comparative studies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(2):378–387. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources