Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 5:9:739-747.
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S142078. eCollection 2017.

Cycle control with an extended-regimen oral contraceptive combining levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol that includes continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol instead of the traditional hormone-free interval

Affiliations

Cycle control with an extended-regimen oral contraceptive combining levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol that includes continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol instead of the traditional hormone-free interval

Rossella E Nappi et al. Int J Womens Health. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate scheduled and unscheduled bleeding and spotting over 1 year of treatment with 91-day extended-regimen combined oral contraception (COC) providing continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) in place of the traditional 7-day hormone-free interval (HFI).

Patients and methods: This post hoc analysis of a multicenter, open-label, 1-year, Phase 3 study of extended-regimen COC with 30 µg EE/150 µg levonorgestrel (LNG) for 84 days and EE 10 µg for 7 days included 799 sexually active, adult women who completed at least one 91-day cycle of therapy. Subjects recorded bleeding and spotting episodes daily using electronic diaries. Logistic regression analyses are reported as ORs with 95% CIs.

Results: There was a 10% increase (OR =1.102; 95% CI: 1.006-1.206) in the likelihood of reporting no scheduled bleeding for each additional 91-day cycle completed. From the third 91-day cycle, more than one fifth of women reported no scheduled bleeding (third cycle =23% [121/533]; fourth cycle =22% [97/446]). Among women who reported no scheduled bleeding at Cycle 1 (136/758 [18%]), ≥45% showed sustained lack of scheduled bleeding in later cycles. There were increases of 53% (OR =1.531; 95% CI: 1.393-1.683) and 31% (OR =1.307; 95% CI: 1.205-1.418) in the likelihood of reporting 0 to ≤6 days vs >6 days of unscheduled bleeding and spotting, respectively, for each additional 91-day cycle. By Cycle 2, more than 80% of women reported no unscheduled bleeding or ≤6 days of unscheduled bleeding during each 91-day cycle.

Conclusion: Improved cycle control with decreased bleeding over time was shown during extended-regimen COC with 30 µg EE/150 µg LNG for 84 days and continuous low-dose EE instead of the traditional 7-day HFI. Women considering this regimen should be informed that those who complete at least one 91-day COC cycle will likely experience less bleeding/spotting in future cycles.

Keywords: 91-day cycle; combined oral contraception; extended-regimen COC; menstrual cycle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure REN had a financial relationship (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Bayer-Schering Pharma, Endoceutics, Gedeon Richter, HRA Pharma, Merck Sharpe & Dohme (MSD), Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc, Shionogi Limited, Teva/Theramex, and Zambon SpA. PLA had financial relationship (member of advisory boards, lecturer, and/or consultant) with Bayer, Effik, MSD, Smith & Nephew, and Teva. JH is an employee of Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. MCM is a consultant for Teva Europe Women’s Health Medical Affairs. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of women reporting the occurrence of scheduled bleeding (A) or spotting (B) during each extended-regimen 91-day cycle. Note: Women receiving 91-day extended-regimen COC with 30 µg EE/150 µg LNG for 84 days and EE 10 µg for 7 days showed a 10% increase in the likelihood of reporting no scheduled bleeding (OR =1.102 [95% CI: 1.006–1.206]) and a 9% increase in the likelihood of reporting no scheduled spotting (OR =1.085 [95% CI: 1.005–1.170]) for each additional 91-day cycle completed. Abbreviations: COC, combined oral contraception; EE, ethinyl estradiol; LNG, levonorgestrel.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of women reporting 0 to ≤6 days or >6 days of unscheduled bleeding during each extended-regimen 91-day cycle. Note: Women receiving 91-day extended-regimen COC with 30 µg EE/150 µg LNG for 84 days and EE 10 µg for 7 days showed a 53% increase in the likelihood of reporting 0 to ≤6 days of unscheduled bleeding per 91-day cycle (OR =1.531 [95% CI: 1.393–1.683]). Abbreviations: COC, combined oral contraception; EE, ethinyl estradiol; LNG, levonorgestrel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of women reporting 0 to ≤6 days or >6 days of unscheduled spotting during each extended-regimen 91-day cycle. Note: Women receiving 91-day extended-regimen COC with 30 µg EE/150 µg LNG for 84 days and EE 10 µg for 7 days showed a 31% increase in the odds of reporting 0 to ≤6 days of unscheduled spotting per 91-day cycle (OR =1.307 [95% CI: 1.205–1.418]). Abbreviations: COC, combined oral contraception; EE, ethinyl estradiol; LNG, levonorgestrel.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of women reporting no unscheduled bleeding during each extended-regimen 91-day cycle by COC use history (A), smoker status (B), BMI (C), and age (D). Note: *Chi-square test, P<0.05. Abbreviations: COC, combined oral contraception; BMI, body mass index.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hooper DJ. Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey. Clin Drug Invest. 2010;30(11):749–763. - PubMed
    1. Egarter C, Frey Tirri B, Bitzer J, et al. Women’s perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling. BMC Women’s Health. 2013;13:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seval DL, Buckley T, Kuehl TJ, Sulak PJ. Attitudes and prescribing patterns of extended-cycle oral contraceptives. Contraception. 2011;84(1):71–75. - PubMed
    1. Panicker S, Mann S, Shawe J, Stephenson J. Evolution of extended use of the combined oral contraceptive pill. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;40(2):133–141. - PubMed
    1. Edelman A, Micks E, Gallo MF, Jensen JT, Grimes DA. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD004695. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources