Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Apr;22(3):1523-1530.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2251-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia

Daniel G E Thiem et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficiency of local infiltration anesthesia administered with a pressure syringe (P-INF) via a special technique versus direct block anesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IANB) for tooth extraction in the posterior mandible.

Materials and methods: In a prospective randomized study, 101 teeth in 101 patients were extracted in the posterior mandible under local anesthesia whereby two different administration techniques were used (P-INF n = 48; IANB n = 53). Primary objectives were comparisons of anesthetic success rate (yes/no) and efficacy (full/sufficient vs. insufficient). Secondary objectives were patients' pain perception during treatment, pain of injection (numerical rating scale), need for second injections (always IANB), time until onset of anesthetic action (min), and duration of local numbness (min).

Results: IANB was successful in all cases, whereas initial P-INF achieved 35% of success only. Furthermore, IANB reached significant higher values of anesthetic efficacy compared to P-INF (P < 0.001). Concerning pain of injection, patients rated IANB to be more painful (P = 0.039). Second injections were significantly more often necessary for P-INF (P = 0.006) whereas duration until onset of action as well as the duration of local numbness were found to be equal.

Conclusions: For anesthetic efficacy as well as anesthetic success, block anesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IANB) turned out to be more proficient to local infiltration via special delivering system with a special technique.

Clinical relevance: Infiltration, even when performed with 4% articaine and a pressure syringe system, is not a suitable method of anesthesia in the posterior mandible.

Keywords: Anesthetic success; IANB; Local anesthesia; Mandibular molar tooth extraction; Molar region of the mandible; Pressure syringe system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):753-8 - PubMed
    1. J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):514-8 - PubMed
    1. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;71(10):1658.e1-5 - PubMed
    1. J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5 - PubMed
    1. J Endod. 1993 Jul;19(7):370-3 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources