Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia
- PMID: 29043507
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2251-7
Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficiency of local infiltration anesthesia administered with a pressure syringe (P-INF) via a special technique versus direct block anesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IANB) for tooth extraction in the posterior mandible.
Materials and methods: In a prospective randomized study, 101 teeth in 101 patients were extracted in the posterior mandible under local anesthesia whereby two different administration techniques were used (P-INF n = 48; IANB n = 53). Primary objectives were comparisons of anesthetic success rate (yes/no) and efficacy (full/sufficient vs. insufficient). Secondary objectives were patients' pain perception during treatment, pain of injection (numerical rating scale), need for second injections (always IANB), time until onset of anesthetic action (min), and duration of local numbness (min).
Results: IANB was successful in all cases, whereas initial P-INF achieved 35% of success only. Furthermore, IANB reached significant higher values of anesthetic efficacy compared to P-INF (P < 0.001). Concerning pain of injection, patients rated IANB to be more painful (P = 0.039). Second injections were significantly more often necessary for P-INF (P = 0.006) whereas duration until onset of action as well as the duration of local numbness were found to be equal.
Conclusions: For anesthetic efficacy as well as anesthetic success, block anesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IANB) turned out to be more proficient to local infiltration via special delivering system with a special technique.
Clinical relevance: Infiltration, even when performed with 4% articaine and a pressure syringe system, is not a suitable method of anesthesia in the posterior mandible.
Keywords: Anesthetic success; IANB; Local anesthesia; Mandibular molar tooth extraction; Molar region of the mandible; Pressure syringe system.
Comment in
-
Local anesthetic administered with a pressure syringe system probably results in less successful and insufficient anesthesia than an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients undergoing mandibular posterior tooth extractions.J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Feb;149(2):e47. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 28. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29195698 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth.Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2248-2. Epub 2017 Oct 15. Clin Oral Investig. 2018. PMID: 29034443 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block.Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2241-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1712-8. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. PMID: 26791025 Clinical Trial.
-
Anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration or periodontal ligament injections with articaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis in the mandibular first molar.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Nov;108(5):e89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Sep 12. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009. PMID: 19748293 Clinical Trial.
-
Articaine buccal infiltration for mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: is it as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine? a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 21;29(3):146. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06229-0. Clin Oral Investig. 2025. PMID: 39982504
-
The use of the mandibular infiltration anesthetic technique in adults.J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Sep;142 Suppl 3:19S-24S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0343. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011. PMID: 21881058 Review.
Cited by
-
Buffered 4% Articaine Reduces Pain and Enhances Anesthesia in Maxillary Third Molar Extractions: A Randomized, Double-Blind Split-Mouth Study.Biomedicines. 2024 Nov 25;12(12):2691. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122691. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39767598 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal needle characteristics for classical inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia: a systematic review.Head Face Med. 2025 Feb 3;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00481-1. Head Face Med. 2025. PMID: 39901265 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Pain Perception Between Local Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Techniques in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Lower Premolar Extractions.Cureus. 2023 Nov 14;15(11):e48794. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48794. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38098898 Free PMC article.
-
The bevel effect: a prospective, randomized investigation into needle design in dental intraligamentary anesthesia.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 24;28(3):170. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05546-0. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 38396049
-
Local anesthesia for mandibular third molar extraction.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;18(5):287-294. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.5.287. Epub 2018 Oct 31. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018. PMID: 30402548 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical