Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb;15(1):53-61.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.12822. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Wound care evidence, knowledge and education amongst nurses: a semi-systematic literature review

Affiliations
Review

Wound care evidence, knowledge and education amongst nurses: a semi-systematic literature review

Lynn Welsh. Int Wound J. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine the knowledge and skills of nurses involved in wound care, to provide a critical overview of the current evidence base underpinning wound care and to determine the extent of utilisation of existing evidence by nurses involved in the management of wounds in practice. A semi-systematic review of the literature was undertaken on Cinahl, Medline Science Direct and Cochrane using the search terms: wound, tissue viability, education, nurse, with limitations set for dates between 2009 and 2017 and English language. Shortfalls were found in the evidence base underpinning wound care and in links between evidence and practice, prevalence of ritualistic practice and in structured education at pre- and post-registration levels. The evidence underpinning wound care practice should be further developed, including the conduction of independent studies and research of qualitative design to obtain rich data on both patient and clinician experiences of all aspects of wound management. More structured wound care education programmes, both at pre-registration/undergraduate and professional development levels, should be established.

Keywords: Education; Nurse; Tissue Viability; Wound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search strategy algorithm. PRISMA 35.

References

    1. Graves N, Zheng H. The prevalence and incidence of chronic wounds: a literature review. Wound Pract Res 2014;22:4–19.
    1. Posnett F, Franks PJ. The burden of chronic wounds in the UK. Nurs Times 2008;104:44–5. - PubMed
    1. Guest JF, Gerrish A, Vowden P, Vowden K. Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open 2015;5:e009283. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283 [accessed on 20 February 2017]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Augustin M, Carville K, Clark M, Curran J, Flour M, Lindholm C, Price P. (2012) Optimising wellbeing in people living with a wound: an expert working review group. URL: http://woundsinternational.com [accessed on 24 February 2017].
    1. Milne J. The challenge of providing cost‐effective wound care. Wounds 2016;12:52–7.