Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability
- PMID: 29045178
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18704
Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this article are to summarize breast cancer screening recommendations and discuss their differences and similarities and to explain the differences between two national databases to aid in interpretation of their benchmarks.
Conclusion: The American College of Radiology, American Cancer Society, and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force all agree that annual mammography beginning at age 40 saves the most lives, and all acknowledge a woman's right to choose when to begin and stop screening. The National Mammography Database (NMD) differs from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium database in that it acquires data using the same approach used by almost all mammography facilities in the United States. Therefore, NMD benchmarks, which include standard metrics, provide more meaningful comparisons to help mammography facilities and radiologists improve performance.
Keywords: breast cancer; guidelines; metrics; screening mammography.
Similar articles
-
National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):49-58. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161174. Epub 2016 Dec 5. Radiology. 2017. PMID: 27918707 Free PMC article.
-
The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr;206(4):883-90. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14312. Epub 2016 Feb 11. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016. PMID: 26866649
-
National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):59-69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161519. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Radiology. 2017. PMID: 28244803 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Breast Cancer in Women Age 75 Years and Older.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):256-263. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18705. Epub 2017 Nov 7. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018. PMID: 29112471 Review.
-
Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;60(2):99-119. doi: 10.3322/caac.20063. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010. PMID: 20228384 Review.
Cited by
-
Breast cancer screening in average-risk women: towards personalized screening.Br J Radiol. 2019 Nov;92(1103):20190660. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190660. Epub 2019 Sep 23. Br J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31538501 Free PMC article.
-
Review of methods for intraoperative margin detection for breast conserving surgery.J Biomed Opt. 2018 Oct;23(10):1-19. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.10.100901. J Biomed Opt. 2018. PMID: 30369108 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;203(3):599-612. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07124-6. Epub 2023 Oct 28. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 37897646
-
Change Is Good: The Evolution and Future of Breast Imaging.Radiology. 2023 Mar;306(3):e230018. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230018. Epub 2023 Feb 7. Radiology. 2023. PMID: 36803001 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(7):e216-e221. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26334. Epub 2019 Jan 11. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30632645 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical