Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 28;120(6):923-936.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx103.

Phylogenetic and functional signals in gymnosperm ovular secretions

Affiliations

Phylogenetic and functional signals in gymnosperm ovular secretions

Massimo Nepi et al. Ann Bot. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Gymnosperms are either wind-pollinated (anemophilous) or both wind- and insect-pollinated (ambophilous). Regardless of pollination mode, ovular secretions play a key role in pollen capture, germination and growth; they are likely also involved in pollinator reward. Little is known about the broad-scale diversity of ovular secretions across gymnosperms, and how these may relate to various reproductive functions. This study analyses the sugar and amino acid profiles of ovular secretions across a range of ambophilous (cycads and Gnetales) and anemophilous gymnosperms (conifers) to place them in an evolutionary context of their possible functions during reproduction.

Methods: Ovular secretions from 13 species representing all five main lineages of extant gymnosperms were sampled. High-performance liquid chromatography techniques were used to measure sugar and amino acid content. Multivariate statistics were applied to assess whether there are significant differences in the chemical profiles of anemophilous and ambophilous species. Data were compared with published chemical profiles of angiosperm nectar. Chemical profiles were placed in the context of phylogenetic relationships.

Key results: Total sugar concentrations were significantly higher in ovular secretions of ambophilous species than wind-pollinated taxa such as Pinaceae and Cupressophyta. Ambophilous species had lower amounts of total amino acids, and a higher proportion of non-protein amino acids compared with anemophilous lineages, and were also comparable to angiosperm nectar. Results suggest that early gymnosperms likely had ovular secretion profiles that were a mosaic of those associated with modern anemophilous and ambophilous species. Ginkgo, thought to be anemophilous, had a profile typical of ambophilous taxa, suggesting that insect pollination either exists in Gingko, but is undocumented, or that its ancestral populations were insect-pollinated.

Conclusions: Chemical profiles of ovular secretions of ambophilous gymnosperms show a clear signal of pollinator-driven selection, including higher levels of carbohydrates than anemophilous taxa, lower levels of amino acids, and the presence of specific amino acids, such as β-alanine, that are known to influence insect feeding behaviour and physiology.

Keywords: Amino acids; Ginkgo; floral nectar; gymnosperms; ovular secretions; pollination; sugars.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Total sugar concentration and total amino acid concentration in wind-pollinated and wind- and insect-pollinated gymnosperms and in floral nectar of representative entomophilous angiosperms: Cucurbita pepo (Cp); Cerinthe major (Cm); and Gentiana lutea(Gl). Ginkgo biloba (Gb) and Ephedra minuta (Em) are plotted separately to highlight their ambophilous-like concentrations.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
General amino acid profile of ovular secretions of insect- and wind-pollinated gymnosperms and floral nectar of the representative entomophilous angiosperms Cucurbita pepo, Cerinthe major and Gentiana lutea. Ginkgo biloba and Ephedra minuta are plotted separately to highlight their ambophilous-like profiles.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Principal components analysis of sugar and amino acid contents in the ovular secretions of 13 species of gymnosperms and floral nectar of representative entomophilous angiosperms Cucurbita pepo, Cerinthe major and Gentiana lutea. Taxon abbreviations are as noted in Table 1.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Least squares parsimony reconstruction of absolute concentration of fructose versus absolute concentration of non-protein amino acids (A) and absolute concentration of total sugars (TAC) versus absolute concentration of proline (B). Phylogeny is based on Leslie et al. (2012) and Xi et al. (2013). Taxon abbreviations are as noted in Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackerman JD. 2000. Abiotic pollen and pollination: ecological, functional and evolutionary perspectives. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 167–185.
    1. von Aderkas P, Nepi M, Rise M et al. 2012. Post-pollination prefertilization drops affect germination rates of heterospecific pollen in larch and Douglas-fir. Sexual Plant Reproduction 25: 215–225. - PubMed
    1. Baker HG, Baker I. 1982. Chemical constituents of nectar in relation to pollination mechanisms and phylogeny. In: Nitecki MH. ed. Biochemical aspects of evolutionary biology. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 131–171.
    1. Baker HG, Baker I. 1983. A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. In: Bentley B, Elias T eds. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press, 126–151.
    1. Barlow C. 2000. The ghosts of evolution: nonsensical fruit, missing partners, and other ecological anachronisms. New York: Perseus Books.