Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;106(6):1422-1430.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.140459. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

Bone mineral density during pregnancy in women participating in a randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Bone mineral density during pregnancy in women participating in a randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation

Wei Wei et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about bone mineral density (BMD) during pregnancy. Advances in technology with lower radiation emissions by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry instruments now permit the safe measurement of BMD during pregnancy.Objective: We evaluated maternal BMD during pregnancy as a function of vitamin D status in women of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds.Design: A total of 301 women who underwent BMD measurements at 12-20 wk of gestation and again at 0-14 wk postpartum were included in this analysis. Women were a subset of subjects who were recruited for a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy (400, 2000, or 4000 IU/d).Results: Treatment had no significant effect on changes in BMD that occurred between 12-20 wk of gestation and 0-14 wk postpartum. Similarly, changes in spine and femoral neck bone mineral contents (BMCs) were not significantly different in the treatment groups. In addition, vitamin D inadequacy (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration, averaged across pregnancy, <50 nmol/L) was not associated with changes in BMD or BMC. There were significant racial/ethnic differences in spine BMD. African Americans lost more spine BMD than did Caucasians (-0.04 ± 0.04 compared with -0.02 ± 0.04 g/cm2; P = 0.033). In addition, baseline obesity was associated with a greater loss of femoral neck BMD. The means ± SDs of femoral neck BMD loss were -0.02 ± 0.05 and 0.0 ± 0.03 g/cm2 for groups with baseline body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) ≥30 and <30, respectively.Conclusion: These findings do not support a dose effect of vitamin D supplementation on bone health and suggest that race/ethnicity and BMI play an important role in pregnancy bone health. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00292591.

Keywords: bone mineral content; bone mineral density; cholecalciferol; pregnancy; vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram of pregnancy study bone mineral density subset. DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentages of changes of BMD at 0–14 wk postpartum relative to BMD at 12–20 wk of gestation are shown by treatment, race, obesity status, and vitamin D status, respectively, for the cohort of 301 women. Circles represent outliers, and upper and lower bars represent ranges of data without including outliers. The upper, middle, and bottom of each box represent the 75%, 50%, and 25% quantiles of data, respectively. (A) Percentages of changes were not significantly different between treatment groups for the spine (P = 0.769) and femoral neck (P = 0.859). (B) Percentages of changes in spine BMD (P = 0.002) were significantly different in race/ethnicities, and percentages of changes in femoral neck BMD (P = 0.058) were trending. (C) Obesity tended to be associated with greater loss of spine BMD (P = 0.054) and was associated with femoral neck BMD (P < 0.001). (D) Vitamin D status was not associated with percentages of changes in spine BMD (P = 0.867) or femoral neck BMD (P = 0.104). BMI is expressed as kg/m2. BMD, bone mineral density.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Changes in BMD and BMC as a function of mean 25(OH)D (n = 301). On the basis of Spearman’s rank correlation test, the mean 25(OH)D concentration during pregnancy was not associated with changes in spine BMD (r = 0.03, P = 0.591), femoral neck BMD (r = 0.07, P = 0.211), spine BMC (r = −0.05, P = 0.352), or femoral neck BMC (r = 0.07, P = 0.200), respectively. BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drinkwater BL, Chesnut CH III. Bone density changes during pregnancy and lactation in active women: a longitudinal study. Bone Miner 1991;14:153–60. - PubMed
    1. Naylor KE, Iqbal P, Fledelius C, Fraser RB, Eastell R. The effect of pregnancy on bone density and bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:129–37. - PubMed
    1. Kaur M, Pearson D, Godber I, Lawson N, Baker P, Hosking D. Longitudinal changes in bone mineral density during normal pregnancy. Bone 2003;32:449–54. - PubMed
    1. Dahlman I, Gerdhem P, Bergstrom I. Vitamin D status and bone health in immigrant versus Swedish women during pregnancy and the post-partum period. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2013;13:464–9. - PubMed
    1. Hollis BW, Johnson D, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Wagner CL. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and effectiveness. J Bone Miner Res 2011;26:2341–57. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data