Radiographic Assessment on Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
- PMID: 29046504
- PMCID: PMC5735228
- DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0249
Radiographic Assessment on Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy
Abstract
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (ELF) is a novel minimally invasive technique used to treat lumbar foraminal stenosis. However, the validity of foraminal decompression based on quantitative assessment using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not yet been established. The objective of this study was to investigate the radiographic efficiency of ELF using MRI. Radiographic changes of neuroforamen were measured based on pre- and postoperative MRI findings. Images were blindly analyzed by two observers for foraminal stenosis grade and foraminal dimensions. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and k statistic were calculated to determine interobserver agreement. Thirty-five patients with 40 neuroforamen were evaluated. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score improved from 8.4 to 2.1, and the mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) improved from 65.9 to 19.2. Overall, 91.4% of the patients achieved good or excellent outcomes. The mean grade of foraminal stenosis significantly improved from 2.63 to 0.68. There were significant increases in the mean foraminal area (FA) from 50.05 to 92.03 mm2, in mean foraminal height (FH) from 11.36 to 13.47 mm, in mean superior foraminal width (SFW) from 6.43 to 9.27 mm, and in mean middle foraminal width (MFW) from 1.47 to 78 mm (P < 0.001). Interobserver agreements for preoperative and postoperative measurements were good to excellent with the exception of SFW. In conclusion, foraminal dimensions and grades of foraminal stenosis significantly improved after ELF. These findings may enhance the clinical relevance of endoscopic lumbar foraminal decompression.
Keywords: endoscopic; foraminotomy; interobserver agreement; magnetic resonance imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Full-Endoscopic Foraminotomy with a Novel Large Endoscopic Trephine for Severe Degenerative Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis at L5 S1 Level: An Advanced Surgical Technique.Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):659-668. doi: 10.1111/os.12924. Epub 2021 Jan 27. Orthop Surg. 2021. PMID: 33506594 Free PMC article.
-
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Contralateral Foraminal and Lateral Recess Decompression via an Interlaminar Approach in Patients with Unilateral Radiculopathy from Unilateral Foraminal Stenosis.World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:763-773. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 12. World Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 28919229
-
Uniportal Full-endoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes.Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(8):1861-1870. doi: 10.1111/os.14102. Epub 2024 Jun 6. Orthop Surg. 2024. PMID: 38841821 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Current Literature on Clinical Outcomes of Uniportal Interlaminar Contralateral Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis.World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:392-397. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.130. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 36527218
-
Is Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Superior to Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Postoperative Radiologic Outcomes of Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease? A Systematic Review.J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;85(2):182-191. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-2694. Epub 2023 Feb 6. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2024. PMID: 36746397
Cited by
-
SPINE: High heterogeneity and no significant differences in clinical outcomes of endoscopic foraminotomy vs fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a meta-analysis.EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Feb 21;8(2):73-89. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0093. EFORT Open Rev. 2023. PMID: 36806547 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Morphometric change in intervertebral foramen after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an in vivo radiographic study based on three-dimensional foramen reconstruction.Int Orthop. 2023 Apr;47(4):1061-1069. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05664-y. Epub 2022 Dec 24. Int Orthop. 2023. PMID: 36564642
-
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17. Int J Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35177530 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reulen HJ, Pfaundler S, Ebeling U: The lateral microsurgical approach to the “extracanalicular” lumbar disc herniation. I: A technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 84: 64–67, 1987 - PubMed
-
- Wiltse LL, Spencer CW: New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 13: 696–706, 1988 - PubMed
-
- Chang SB, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Kim JM: Risk factor for unsatisfactory outcome after lumbar foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Spine 31: 1163–1167, 2006 - PubMed
-
- Kunogi J, Hasue M: Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine 16: 1312–1320, 1991 - PubMed
-
- Donaldson WF, Star MJ, Thorne RP: Surgical treatment for the far lateral herniated lumbar disc. Spine 18: 1263–1267, 1993 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous