Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;20(5):536-544.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.143. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Recurrent variants in OTOF are significant contributors to prelingual nonsydromic hearing loss in Saudi patients

Affiliations

Recurrent variants in OTOF are significant contributors to prelingual nonsydromic hearing loss in Saudi patients

Naif A M Almontashiri et al. Genet Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

PurposeHearing loss is more prevalent in the Saudi Arabian population than in other populations; however, the full range of genetic etiologies in this population is unknown. We report the genetic findings from 33 Saudi hearing-loss probands of tribal ancestry, with predominantly prelingual severe to profound hearing loss.MethodsTesting was performed over the course of 2012-2016, and involved initial GJB2 sequence and GJB6-D13S1830 deletion screening, with negative cases being reflexed to a next-generation sequencing panel with 70, 71, or 87 hearing-loss genes.ResultsA "positive" result was reached in 63% of probands, with two recurrent OTOF variants (p.Glu57* and p.Arg1792His) accountable for a third of all "positive" cases. The next most common cause was pathogenic variants in MYO7A and SLC26A4, each responsible for three "positive" cases. Interestingly, only one "positive" diagnosis had a DFNB1-related cause, due to a homozygous GJB6-D13S1830 deletion, and no sequence variants in GJB2 were detected.ConclusionOur findings implicate OTOF as a potential major contributor to hearing loss in the Saudi population, while highlighting the low contribution of GJB2, thus offering important considerations for clinical testing strategies for Saudi patients. Further screening of Saudi patients is needed to characterize the genetic spectrum in this population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Several authors (A.O. H.L.R., and S.S.A.) are employed by the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, a nonprofit fee-for-service clinical laboratory performing hereditary hearing loss testing. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the genetic testing strategy used to identify causal variants in Saudi patients with prelingual sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). CNVs, copy-number variants; ddPCR, droplet digital PCR; indels, insertions and/deletions; NGS, next-generation sequencing.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regional distribution of the Saudi families with a “positive” genetic testing result in our cohort. For families with a nonrecurring variant, family IDs are shown in red near the province (in white) of their current place of residence. The family IDs of the recurrent p.Glu57* and p.Arg1792His variants are shown in dark blue and yellow, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagnostic rate and distribution of variants across genes in 33 Saudi sensorineural hearing loss probands. (a) Counts of total variants across hearing loss genes by classification. (b) Diagnostic rate of DFNB1 screening/OtoGenome NGS panel testing for this cohort (c). Gene contribution of causative variants in “positive” probands. LP/P: likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant; VUS, variant of uncertain significance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pedigrees for Saudi families with clinically significant variants or suspect VUS variants (F-14). The OtoGenome panel version used for proband testing is shown below the pedigree. For Family F-30, a causative variant (GJB6-D13S1830) was identified on the initial DFNB1 assay. Please note that the parents in in families F-8, F-9, F-21, F-25, F-26, F-27, F-30, F-31, F-33 were not tested and represent obligate carriers (see Supplementary Table 1 for a list of all family members who were screened for familial variants). Het, heterozygous; Hom, homozygous.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hilgert N, Smith RJ, Van Camp G. Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics? Mutat Res 2009;681:189–196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Denoyelle F, Weil D, Maw MA et al. Prelingual deafness: high prevalence of a 30delG mutation in the connexin 26 gene. Hum Mol Genet 1997;6:2173–2177. - PubMed
    1. Francey LJ, Conlin LK, Kadesch HE et al. Genome-wide SNP genotyping identifies the Stereocilin (STRC) gene as a major contributor to pediatric bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A:298–308. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zakzouk S. Consanguinity and hearing impairment in developing countries: a custom to be discouraged. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:811–816. - PubMed
    1. El-Hazmi MA, al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, al-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, al-Meshari AA. Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genet 1995;32:623–626. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts