Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Mar 1;153(3):209-215.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3151.

Management of Stage I Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal

Christy Y Chai  1 , Hop S Tran Cao  1 , Samir Awad  1 , Nader N Massarweh  1   2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Management of Stage I Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal

Christy Y Chai et al. JAMA Surg. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Presentation of Author's Name.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Surg. 2018 Jul;153(7):692. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1624. Epub 2018 May 23. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 29799919 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) is increasing. Although standard management of SCCAC includes the use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy), data are lacking on potentially less morbid, alternative management strategies, such as local excision, among patients with node-negative T1 disease.

Objectives: To examine the use of local excision among patients with T1 SCCAC and to compare overall survival relative to those who received standard treatment with chemoradiotherapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study assessed 2243 patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2012) between 18 and 80 years of age with T1N0M0 SCCAC. The association between the type of treatment received and overall risk of death was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Data analysis was performed from June 29, 2016, to April 17, 2017.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival.

Results: Among 2243 patients with T1N0 SCCAC, 503 (22.4%) were treated with local excision alone (mean [SD] age, 54.5 [12.1] years; 240 [47.7%] male; 419 [83.3%] white) and 1740 with chemoradiotherapy (mean [SD] age, 57.0 [10.6] years; 562 [32.3%] male; 1547 [88.9%] white). Among those treated with chemoradiotherapy, 12 patients underwent a subsequent abdominoperineal resection. There was a statistically significant increase in the use of local excision during the study period (34 [17.3%] in 2004 to 68 [30.8%] in 2012; trend test, P < .001). This increase in use was observed among patients with primary tumors that measured 1 cm or smaller and greater than 1 cm to 2 cm or smaller (trend test, P < .001 for both). Overall survival at 5 years was not significantly different for the 2 management strategies (85.3% in the local excision cohort and 86.8% in the chemoradiotherapy cohort; log-rank test, P = .93). Overall risk of death was not significantly different for local excision alone relative to that for treatment with chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.78-1.44). These findings were robust when stratified by tumor size and when patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection after chemoradiotherapy were excluded.

Conclusions and Relevance: The use of local excision alone for the management of T1N0 SCCAC has significantly increased over time, with no clear decrement in overall survival. Because local excision may represent a lower-cost, less morbid treatment option for select patients with SCCAC, future studies are needed to better delineate its role and efficacy relative to the current standard of chemoradiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Inclusion and Exclusion of the Study Participants
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Significant Increase in the Use of Local Excision for Patients With T1N0 Disease Regardless of Tumor Size
P < .001 (trend test) for all except those with tumors 1 cm or smaller (trend test, P = .04).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Difference in Overall Survival by Treatment
P = .93 (log-rank test).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Stat fact sheets: anal cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/anus.html. Published 2015. Accessed April 12, 2017.
    1. Glynne-Jones R, Renehan A. Current treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2012;26(6):1315-1350. - PubMed
    1. Nigro ND, Vaitkevicius VK, Considine B Jr. Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canal: a preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1974;17(3):354-356. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Anal carcinoma. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/anal.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2017.
    1. Doyen J, Benezery K, Follana P, et al. . Predictive factors for early and late local toxicities in anal cancer treated by radiotherapy in combination with or without chemotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(10):1125-1133. - PubMed

Publication types