Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jan 6;13(1):100-108.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.06830617. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

A Discrete Choice Study of Patient Preferences for Dialysis Modalities

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Discrete Choice Study of Patient Preferences for Dialysis Modalities

Rachael C Walker et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Improved knowledge about factors that influence patient choices when considering dialysis modality could facilitate health care interventions to increase rates of home dialysis. We aimed to quantify the attributes of dialysis care and the tradeoffs that patients consider when making decisions about dialysis modalities.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We conducted a prospective, discrete choice experiment survey with random parameter logit analysis to quantify preferences and tradeoffs for attributes of dialysis treatment in 143 adult patients with CKD expected to require RRT within 12 months (predialysis). The attributes included schedule flexibility, patient out of pocket costs, subsidized transport services, level of nursing support, life expectancy, dialysis training time, wellbeing on dialysis, and dialysis schedule (frequency and duration). We reported outcomes using β-coefficients with corresponding odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for choosing home-based dialysis (peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis) compared with facility hemodialysis.

Results: Home-based therapies were significantly preferred with the following attributes: longer survival (odds ratio per year, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 2.12), increased treatment flexibility (odds ratio, 9.22; 95% confidence interval, 2.71 to 31.3), improved wellbeing (odds ratio, 210; 95% confidence interval, 15 to 2489), and more nursing support (odds ratio, 87.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.8 to 2014). Respondents were willing to accept additional out of pocket costs of approximately New Zealand $400 (United States $271) per month (95% confidence interval, New Zealand $333 to $465) to receive increased nursing support. Patients were willing to accept out of pocket costs of New Zealand $223 (United States $151) per month (95% confidence interval, New Zealand $195 to $251) for more treatment flexibility.

Conclusions: Patients preferred home dialysis over facility-based care when increased nursing support was available and when longer survival, wellbeing, and flexibility were expected. Sociodemographics, such as age, ethnicity, and income, influenced patient choice.

Keywords: Adult; Choice Behavior; Confidence Intervals; Health Expenditures; Humans; Life Expectancy; Odds Ratio; Patient Preference; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Surveys and Questionnaires; chronic dialysis; chronic kidney disease; chronic kidney failure; dialysis; end stage kidney disease; hemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; renal dialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Choice set example presented to patients. Example of choice set presented to each patient before dialysis in the discrete choice survey. HD, hemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis.

Comment in

References

    1. Walker R, Marshall MR, Morton RL, McFarlane P, Howard K: The cost-effectiveness of contemporary home haemodialysis modalities compared with facility haemodialysis: A systematic review of full economic evaluations. Nephrology (Carlton) 19: 459–470, 2014 - PubMed
    1. Karopadi AN, Mason G, Rettore E, Ronco C: Cost of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis across the world. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28: 2553–2569, 2013 - PubMed
    1. Treharne C, Liu FX, Arici M, Crowe L, Farooqui U: Peritoneal dialysis and in-centre haemodialysis: A cost-utility analysis from a UK payer perspective. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 12: 409–420, 2014 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall MR, Walker RC, Polkinghorne KR, Lynn KL: Survival on home dialysis in New Zealand. PLoS One 9: e96847, 2014 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall MR, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG, Agar JW, Hawley CM, McDonald SP: Temporal changes in mortality risk by dialysis modality in the Australian and New Zealand dialysis population. Am J Kidney Dis 66: 489–498, 2015 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms