Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;28(3):415-421.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2058-x. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

The smartphone inclinometer: A new tool to determine elbow range of motion?

Frédéric Vauclair  1 , Abdulaziz Aljurayyan  2   3 , Fahad H Abduljabbar  4   3 , Bardia Barimani  3   5 , Patrick Goetti  1 , Fiona Houghton  3 , Edward J Harvey  3 , Dominique M Rouleau  6
Affiliations

The smartphone inclinometer: A new tool to determine elbow range of motion?

Frédéric Vauclair et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: There are easily accessible tools on smartphones (APP) for measuring elbow range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity of a particular APP in determining elbow ROM in comparison with the commonly used goniometer (GON), surgeon estimation of range (EST) and measurement on X-ray (XR).

Methods: The study included 20 patients (40 elbows). Flexion, extension, pronation and supination were measured using three different methods: EST, GON and APP. Radiographic measurements were taken using the average humeral diaphysis axis and dorsal midthird of ulna in flexion and extension.

Results: The accuracy of the three different methods has been compared to GON using statistical analysis (ANOVA and paired samples test). There was no statistically significant difference for XR flexion measurement (mean of 2.8° ± 1.5°). The APP overestimated flexion (mean of 6.4° ± 1.0°), and EST underestimated it (mean of - 7.9° ± 1.1°). For extension, the mean difference was 2.8° ± 0.7° for EST and - 26.8° ± 3.1° for XR. The APP method did not significantly differ from GON. Supination accuracy was greater with EST (2.7° ± 1.7°) than with APP (5.9° ± 1.9°). There was no difference for pronation measurement with both EST and APP.

Conclusions: This study is the first comparing four measurement techniques of elbow ROM. Our results showed that EST was only accurate for forearm rotation. The XR scored the best for flexion but is less reliable for extension. Surprisingly, compared to GON, APP did not correlate as we expected for flexion and supination, but the other methods were also inaccurate. We found APP to be very useful to measure complete arc of motion (difference between maximal flexion and maximal extension).

Level of evidence: III, Retrospective review of a prospective cohort of elbow fracture patients: Diagnostic Study.

Keywords: Accuracy; Elbow range of motion; Goniometer; Inclinometer; Smartphone application; X-ray measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Dec;9(47):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-82 - PubMed
    1. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Dec;64(12 Suppl 2):S27-9 - PubMed
    1. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Apr;41(4):510-515.e1 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Sep;78(9):1401-4 - PubMed
    1. Unfallchirurg. 2007 Feb;110(2):176-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources