Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;19(4):581-589.
doi: 10.1177/1524839917736511. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

Measuring the Implementation of Youth Empowerment Solutions

Affiliations

Measuring the Implementation of Youth Empowerment Solutions

Susan Morrel-Samuels et al. Health Promot Pract. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Scholars have increasingly emphasized the importance of using evidence-based programs to promote health and prevent disease. While theoretically and empirically based programs may be effective in carefully controlled conditions, many fail to achieve desired outcomes when implemented in real-world settings. Ensuring high-quality implementation of health promotion programs is critically important as variation in implementation is closely associated with program effectiveness. The purpose of this article is to present methods used to document and assess the implementation of the Youth Empowerment Solutions (YES) program. We collected process evaluation data on 25 YES groups from 12 schools over a period of 4 years. The evaluation assessed four key aspects of delivery: fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, and program quality. We found wide variations in delivery for some measures, while others were more consistent across groups. These indicators of program delivery provided a strong basis for evaluating program implementation, taking actions to improve it, and ultimately, deepening understanding of program effectiveness. The study suggests a model for using multiple methods to collect and analyze data about aspects of program delivery to guide future implementations.

Keywords: child/adolescent health; community intervention; evaluation methods; process evaluation; program planning and evaluation; violence prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baranowski T, & Stables G (2000). Process Evaluations of the 5-a-Day Projects. Health Education & Behavior, 27(2), 157–166. 10.1177/109019810002700202 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, & Kilbourne AM (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3, 32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, & Maylahn CM (2009). Evidence-Based Public Health: A Fundamental Concept for Public Health Practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 30(1), 175–201. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, & Stetler C (2012). Effectiveness-implementation Hybrid Designs. Medical Care, 50(3), 217–226. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, & Lowery JC (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources